: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:17 pm  

Marsdengiant wrote:

Maybe not a need but a salient point lost to mutts.

care to pm it , seeing as its so relevant to me

sorry mods if this means a ban being issued , i know you warned us both and then marsden again ...we just dont seem capable .

come on marsden pm it to me

: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:33 am  

Mutts wrote:

:roll: care to pm it , seeing as its so relevant to me

sorry mods if this means a ban being issued , i know you warned us both and then marsden again ...we just dont seem capable .

come on marsden pm it to me

Back to topic.

There are a lot of rumours about recreational drugs in the game. Hopefully the Hock case will be a wake up call for players taking, or thinking about taking, these drugs.

: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:34 am  

Marsdengiant wrote:

:roll:

Back to topic.

There are a lot of rumours about recreational drugs in the game. Hopefully the Hock case will be a wake up call for players taking, or thinking about taking, these drugs.

You seem to have a bit of a habit of making a comment after a mod has tried to get a post back on topic and when you get a reply hide behind the "back to topic" remarks.

I'm getting pretty fecked off with coming onto the board and seeing a poster ridiculed over their point of view because you dont agree with it. In this case Mutts has said his piece and you've said yours. Now lets leave it at that because its obvious neither of you will back down from your respective stances.

I seem to remember thats why you were banned in the first instance. Don't make the same mistake again under this alias.

Last warning!