Re: Disciplinary betting. : Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:20 pm  

Wadski wrote:

11 fans in that shot. The camera's then concentrated on matters on the field as the stadium thinned out.

So shall we start guessing how many left? 20? 30? 40?

13,500 were Wigan fans. 100 Huddersfield fans. Around 20 (shall we say?) left with five minutes to go. Why? Perhaps they have far to travel (the sponsors of Feka are from Cambridge and there's a family who come from Ireland) to beat the traffic?

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:24 pm  

Who cares how many left early? We get crowds that clubs like Huddersfield can only dream of. So if they have to comfort themselves having a dig at some Wigan fans leaving early, then let them....

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:26 pm  

Bondi_Warrior wrote:

Who cares how many left early? We get crowds that clubs like Huddersfield can only dream of. So if they have to comfort themselves having a dig at some Wigan fans leaving early, then let them....

Fair enough.

Go for it Huddersfield fan(s)!

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:32 pm  

Bondi_Warrior wrote:

Who cares how many left early? We get crowds that clubs like Huddersfield can only dream of. So if they have to comfort themselves having a dig at some Wigan fans leaving early, then let them....

All that matters is the final score.

Being there to see is therefore pretty important.

I think the final score was Wigan 16 - 18 Giants.

HTH.

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:34 pm  

Quincy wrote:

:lol: So shall we start guessing how many left? 20? 30? 40?

13,500 were Wigan fans. 100 Huddersfield fans. Around 20 (shall we say?) left with five minutes to go. Why? Perhaps they have far to travel (the sponsors of Feka are from Cambridge and there's a family who come from Ireland) to beat the traffic?

Epic Fail!

Why travel so far and not stay to the end?

I wonder if those guys were travelling further than every Giants fan?

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:40 pm  

Wadski wrote:

All that matters is the final score.

Being there to see is therefore pretty important.

I think the final score was Wigan 16 - 18 Giants.

HTH.

And? I know you won, we were shocking and deserved nothing. So whats your point? I aint the one going on about fans leaving, which is funny considering you have hardly any. So we beat you twice, you beat us once, were top your not. Lets see how we both end the season.

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:24 pm  

Bondi_Warrior wrote:

And? I know you won, we were shocking and deserved nothing. So whats your point? I aint the one going on about fans leaving, which is funny considering you have hardly any. So we beat you twice, you beat us once, were top your not. Lets see how we both end the season.

Define 'hardly any' ?

is that we hardly have any fans cos we didnt take a lot to Wigan(500ish according to Wigan fans) on a Sunday Evening to a game that is pretty much meaningless to us considering were in the play-offs and cant actually win the league leaders shield anymore, or, hardly any because we have an average home attendance of 7,500 ish - which is, of course, thousands less than any other SL team.................

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:36 pm  

Funny isn't it; they get beat so the old crowd chestnut comes out. Kids, if you actually believe that garbage about being a big club etc etc blah blah then you wouldn't be on here measuring pee pees with regards crowds, would you.

3 years in a row we've walked away with the points as the Wigan fans just, well, walk. It would seem it's beginning to annoy them.

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:29 am  

GIANT DAZ wrote:

Define 'hardly any' ?

is that we hardly have any fans cos we didnt take a lot to Wigan(500ish according to Wigan fans) on a Sunday Evening to a game that is pretty much meaningless to us considering were in the play-offs and cant actually win the league leaders shield anymore, or, hardly any because we have an average home attendance of 7,500 ish - which is, of course, thousands less than any other SL team.................

You've never taken any decent numbers anywhere you have been, not just on sunday. Wembley last year was laughable, what was your excuse then? Well 7,500 is less than half of what we average and Leeds, so yea its hardly any

Hey some of you seem to want to have a dig at us for a few Wiganers leaving early, so off course im going to highlight your overal lack of support.

[Durham Giant]

Re: Disciplinary betting. : Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:38 am  

Bondi_Warrior wrote:

You've never taken any decent numbers anywhere you have been, not just on sunday. Wembley last year was laughable, what was your excuse then? Well 7,500 is less than half of what we average and Leeds, so yea its hardly any

Hey some of you seem to want to have a dig at us for a few Wiganers leaving early, so off course im going to highlight your overal lack of support.

Love your sig.

We are counting the days till you move back to australia as well