: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:42 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

REPLY FROM THE MIRROR:
Further to your email I have checked the copy and it appears that there is an error in the headline but the information in the story is correct. Please accept our apologies for any confusion caused.

But we're not going to bother fixing it, that would be too much effort.

Best wishes.
NAME REMOVED
Editorial Assistant

Love the story is correct bit.......that's OK then isn't it Headline in Big Letters ....story in small print. Was this in the hard copy of the paper? If so, we should sue them

... and 10 hours later, they still haven't fixed it.

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:32 am  

LET'S SEE WHAT HAPPENS NOW......
Dear xxxxx,

Further to your email in response to my query regarding the inaccuracy of the report [here]on your site, it would appear that even though you have agreed the headline is inaccurate, you have yet to change it. Whilst I can appreciate that you may be busy, I would have thought that changing the first word of the headline from Harlequins to Warrington...or even Wolves would not prove too taxing.

I look forward to reading the correct headline in the not to distant future.

Kind regards

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:58 pm  

YED79 wrote:

but as a life long fan King is a waste of money and so is monaghan the sooner they go and free up some funds for players with heart the better.

Do you guys want to swap Orr ?

Given Warrington's recent track record in signing big name players, do you think they'd be better off putting resources into developing their own, supplemented with a few overseas players who aren't such big names?

As for Danny Orr, I woudln't swap him for any other number 7 in this league.

: Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:25 pm  

Exactly. Playing Superb at present.