Rupe : Wed Feb 27, 2013 10:21 am
Among the utter mad things he said, he also said things like:"I strongly believe that David Hughes has woken up and realised that losing x per season of his own money on a third rate outfit is a waste of time and money and that without further investment from himself to create a competitive team then applying for a Superleague franchise next time out is pointless. Gus Mackay himself referred to 'marquee signings' for next season so further investment has obviously been found from somewhere."
On McDermott staying: "Again I ask the question, does David Hughes actually care about results?"
In response to Gf's defence of David Hughes at the time: "Of course David Hughes is to blame
Who employs and has the right to fire a coach - David Hughes
Who tolerates defeat after defeat - David Hughes
Who is losing money hand over fist yet really doesn't seem bothered by it - David Hughes
Who has created a franchise that is an insult to Super League - David Hughes
Still carry on clapping if you are happy watching detritus."
"On David Hughes again: "He is responsible for the abomination that is Harlequins RL. Did the villagers applaud when Dr. Frankenstein created his monster?"
"If he keeps McDermott and does not launch a rocket up the players backsides then he deserves the club to die. Perhaps he enjoys watching a fifth rate team and losing money hand over fist."
" It is now only a matter of time before the death of Harlequins RL."
On the state of the playing squad: "Well done you to you 'sponsored by strepsils lot'
As those of us such as myself and stormingbronco who have continually said that unless dramatic changes were made last year have been proved right.
You 'loyal and loud' lot should enjoy your circlejerk over the worst squad assembled in SuperLeague history while it lasts.
Your refusal to demand change will be the cause of the death of professional Rugby League in London."
You'd swear GF would have said this one: "He might know a thing or two about business but it looks like he doesn't know anything about creating a viable Superleague club. Again, I put it back to you, if it was your money and you were losing milllions would you tolerate the status quo at the club in terms of marketing, coaching and players?"
"As I have posted many times before. I cannot fathom how David Hughes is prepared to lose millions of pounds yet tolerates the status quo at the club. How McDermott and most of the players are even contracted to the club is beyond belief."
"If a consortium was to come in and guarantee that the mind numbingly dull coach McDermott was to go and that never again would players like Wells be given 2 year deals etc then I would put in 1000 quid tomorrow."
"You and your ilks acceptance that Jon Wells is even contracted to the club shows a complete lack of awareness that time is running out for Harlequins RL in Super League. Wells might be the most charming man ever to walk planet Earth but this has absolutely nothing to do with Harlequins RL fielding a team worthy of Super League and one that would attract an attendance accepable of Super League."
Windy one wrote: I will be more worried in 2014 if the club have not got 5 to 6 thousand fans coming through the gate reguarly.
Rupe replied: "Two hopes. No hope and Bob Hope and Bob Hope has been dead six years."
"Whoever gave out these contracts should be sacked. Why the hell was Wells offered a two year contract for example when no other Superleague side would go near him?"
"I would have thought the meagre attendances would convince David Hughes that the club needs an enema but it seems he is a man who is happy to listen to the band as the ship sinks."
AND THIS CLASSIC: "When the club finish one place above Crusaders or bottom should they be kicked out of the comp and crowds reach sub 2000 then the RFL will simply say Super League in London has not worked and rightly so. I hope you lot will be proud of how you clapped the trash off the pitch no matter the score and refused to stand up and demand a total change in management and players."
Now that's only a few of his quotes. Can people see a mirroring of what he said in the past being said more recently by others?