Re: Fans Forum : Wed Jun 05, 2013 12:32 pm  

stayinlondon wrote:

GF why do you blame Gus for everything. Maybe he wants a fans forum - and just maybe the purse string holder said NO. Maybe he wants to market the club but again the purse string holder said no as the team are so shamolic he doesnt want to waste any more of his money. Maybe he wants to come clean about Craig Gower going and the board have said NO. Maybe he doesnt want to move games but he has been told he has to do it. None of us sit around the table and none of us are privy to that level of information so we will never know. I am not defending Gus but I do realise he like 99.99% of us have to report to other people and do as we are told in the workplace. However there are smaller issues he could have resolved like hospitality, selling the red shirt - these would have brought money into the club and been small measures to show LB care about their fans. Wanting cheaper hospitality than away fans and wanting to wear the same shirt as the team are not massive issues but they do count in some way to cheering fans especially when they could be cheering a win in a red shirt and should we go all the way to Wembly will fans be allowed to wear the same shirts as their team.

If he want's all that stuff and didn't get it the surely he should resign as he can't do the job he was brought in to do.

Re: Fans Forum : Wed Jun 05, 2013 12:48 pm  

TBF to Gus, he has at least managed to get some sponsors and its the first time in years (apparently) that all the players have had sponsors. n

Sadly, whther you like it (or Gus) or not, his hands are tied by lack of resources and a poor product on the pitch.

Re: Fans Forum : Wed Jun 05, 2013 1:07 pm  

jbuzza wrote:

This is an issue the club brought upon itself. When you have limited resources you should avoid creating problems that don't really exist.

In my opinion, this is a misguided excuse for not building the club in the current location.

The incompetence seems to stem from the top.

And I take it your unhappiness has nothing to do with your current proximity to the Stoop then?

Re: Fans Forum : Wed Jun 05, 2013 1:17 pm  

Dan Stains woz God wrote:

TBF to Gus, he has at least managed to get some sponsors and its the first time in years (apparently) that all the players have had sponsors. n

Sadly, whther you like it (or Gus) or not, his hands are tied by lack of resources and a poor product on the pitch.

That's an extensive list of achievements in 2 1/2 years (along with halving the crowds).

Re: Fans Forum : Wed Jun 05, 2013 1:25 pm  

The reason our crowds have halved is because of the non-performances on the pitch.

Most of the supporters wont even know (or care)who Gus is and won't give a toss about CEO's...they just want to see their team win their home games .

Sadly, our team has been is decline ever since we've been at The Stoop (nothing to do with the location, imo).

Re: Fans Forum : Wed Jun 05, 2013 1:33 pm  

Rob from Erith wrote:

And I take it your unhappiness has nothing to do with your current proximity to the Stoop then?

To be honest, if things carry on like they are I won't give a flying fig where we are playing because I won't be going.

My point is that location is not our biggest problem, arguably it is the least of our problems so why make changing it a priority. There is simply no evidence to suggest we would do better elsewhere. It is a smokescreen.

What probably has changed now is that our crowds are now so pitiful and our ambition seemingly so low that we could play in a much smaller stadium (or maybe in a park somewhere).

Re: Fans Forum : Wed Jun 05, 2013 7:33 pm  

jbuzza wrote:

There is simply no evidence to suggest we would do better elsewhere. It is a smokescreen.

this...with bells on!