Re: Underhill : Sun Jan 04, 2015 10:25 pm  

Not sure that any of the plans suggested lengthening of the pitch for rugby league. So same short pitch for the future.

Re: Underhill : Sun Jan 04, 2015 10:38 pm  

Perry wrote:

Asked a question, and banged on about the past, and called stuff into question. New year, same old drone from you.
You could have just thanked meliferra for keeping us all posted.

I asked a question......pure and simple. Anyhow....ticket info out in a few hours....cant wait. Planning another trip home so will look to catch a game if the price is right!

Re: Underhill : Mon Jan 05, 2015 8:14 am  

gutterfax wrote:

....ticket info out in a few hours....cant wait. Planning another trip home so will look to catch a game if the price is right!

Really? The price of a match ticket is more important to you than the cost of a 12,000 mile flight?

Re: Underhill : Mon Jan 05, 2015 8:40 am  

Perry wrote:

Really? The price of a match ticket is more important to you than the cost of a 12,000 mile flight?

I claim my flights back against the company....tickets to a game are only 50% redeemable.

Re: Underhill : Mon Jan 05, 2015 8:59 am  

Southern Reiver wrote:

Not sure that any of the plans suggested lengthening of the pitch for rugby league. So same short pitch for the future.

You are correct SR, the pitch will certainly be short for this season.
All of the decisions that have been approved are from plans submitted two years ago and so long before there was a suggestion of Broncos coming. He has been waiting for all the previous planning issues to be resolved before submitting new ones.

It will be interesting to see what he applies for next. I have been told that it will be an extended West stand, new north stand behind the North terrace and changes to the East stand to extend towards the car park and put a decent roof in place for the seats on that side.

Re: Underhill : Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:48 am  

gutterfax wrote:

I claim my flights back against the company....tickets to a game are only 50% redeemable.

You'd probably claim for a duckpond if you could.

Re: Underhill : Wed Jan 07, 2015 1:59 pm  

Perry wrote:

You'd probably claim for a duckpond if you could.

Too right I would.