Four in a row? : Tue May 14, 2013 9:01 am  

Bizarrely, after we could not buy a home win, we have now won three in a row!

May the Fourth be with us!

I fancy a bit of Pie at the weekend!

Re: Four in a row? : Tue May 14, 2013 9:27 am  

I can relate to that.
Lets just hope they dont fancy a bit of Horse Meat.

Re: Four in a row? : Tue May 14, 2013 9:38 am  

Winning every week is getting boring we need to lose the occassional one to add some excitement and get the crowds in.



(Only joking)

Re: Four in a row? : Tue May 14, 2013 10:07 am  

No Kaufusi, 2 week holiday for him.

Re: Four in a row? : Tue May 14, 2013 11:05 am  

Bring someone in to replace him who tries and doesn't cheat

Make him run the water for 80 mins to demonstrate how its posible to keep moving for a full game.

This may be a difficult one given the Pies current form.

Re: Four in a row? : Tue May 14, 2013 11:29 am  

If we stay in the game early on you never know but I can't see it. Wigan by 16

Re: Four in a row? : Tue May 14, 2013 3:24 pm  

Ref's Alibert and the touchies messrs Brooke and Roberts. Should be fun. Us by 4.

Re: Four in a row? : Tue May 14, 2013 4:20 pm  

Craig G(l)ower is almost equal to the combined age of Wigan's likely halves. http://www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... young-pair

Craig G(l)ower is almost equal to the combined age of Wigan's likely halves. http://www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... young-pair

Re: Four in a row? : Tue May 14, 2013 4:44 pm  

BroncOnIon wrote: Craig G(l)ower is almost equal to the combined age of Wigan's likely halves. http://www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... young-pair Hmmm Saints were short of experienced haves.................................. could be our day!

BroncOnIon wrote: Craig G(l)ower is almost equal to the combined age of Wigan's likely halves. http://www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... young-pair Hmmm Saints were short of experienced haves.................................. could be our day!

Re: Four in a row? : Tue May 14, 2013 5:28 pm  

poplar panther wrote:

Hmmm Saints were short of experienced haves.................................. could be our day!

Saints don't have a certain Sam Tomkins