Re: Luke Gale : Sat Feb 26, 2011 5:15 pm  

It's not like we're stacked full of half-backs at the moment, so you'd think Skints would have to pay up for his services (especially as he signed a new long term contract last year) and he won't be let go as easily as you may think.

Re: Luke Gale : Sat Feb 26, 2011 6:17 pm  

BroncosTillIDie wrote:

It's not like we're stacked full of half-backs at the moment, so you'd think Skints would have to pay up for his services (especially as he signed a new long term contract last year) and he won't be let go as easily as you may think.

We can't progress on the field if we sell key players unless we have an adequate replacement. The money would be poor compensation if the teams form falls away and with it the numbers on the Terraces.

Re: Luke Gale : Sat Feb 26, 2011 8:17 pm  

To be pedantic we don't have terraces at the Stoop.

Re: Luke Gale : Sat Feb 26, 2011 8:36 pm  

Paddock Punter wrote:

To be pedantic we don't have terraces at the Stoop.

Old habits die hard

Re: Luke Gale : Sat Feb 26, 2011 9:31 pm  

Frosties. wrote: Saints after him to replace Kyle Eastmond when he goes to Rugby Union. Looks like we are gonna find out then. http://www.bathrugbyinsideout.com/2011/ ... Out%29&m=1

Frosties. wrote: Saints after him to replace Kyle Eastmond when he goes to Rugby Union. Looks like we are gonna find out then. http://www.bathrugbyinsideout.com/2011/ ... Out%29&m=1

Re: Luke Gale : Sat Feb 26, 2011 9:37 pm  

Snoopy wrote: Looks like we are gonna find out then. http://www.bathrugbyinsideout.com/2011/ ... Out%29&m=1 Seems like the Saints fans will be throwing a party on Monday then

Snoopy wrote: Looks like we are gonna find out then. http://www.bathrugbyinsideout.com/2011/ ... Out%29&m=1 Seems like the Saints fans will be throwing a party on Monday then

Re: Luke Gale : Sat Feb 26, 2011 9:46 pm  

A sad loss to RL and Saints. You can't replace natural talent like that easily whatever cash they got for him.

Re: Luke Gale : Sun Feb 27, 2011 12:30 am  

Fan50 wrote:

Seems like the Saints fans will be throwing a party on Monday then

But all those comments are anonymous, and all sound like they were writen by the same individual. (Probably PHIPPS.)

Re: Luke Gale : Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:16 am  

I guess the situation regarding Eastmond is interesting . If I were Bath, I wouldn't look to him joining 'til next pre-season. If I were Saints, I'd want to get rid as soon as possible!

Oh, and hands off Luke Gale.

Re: Luke Gale : Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:18 pm  

LUKEY GALE = NOT FOR SALE