Re: v WAKEFIELD (H) : Sat Jun 18, 2011 4:32 pm  

We pip you on aggregate by 2 points. You have to take the consolation where you can get it.

Re: v WAKEFIELD (H) : Sat Jun 18, 2011 4:58 pm  

Well done quins! And i believe a few of the top dogs from the RL were present!
A great result!

Re: v WAKEFIELD (H) : Sat Jun 18, 2011 5:22 pm  

turin wrote:

Well done quins! And i believe a few of the top dogs from the RL were present!
A great result!

Try to ignore the abuse of 'quins have no fans and are badly run' from the wakey mob........ Let's face it wakey can't exactly spout crap about oppositions crowds and poorly managed clubs can they!

Re: v WAKEFIELD (H) : Sat Jun 18, 2011 6:27 pm  

A big improvement today and some players again showed their commitment and determination with their heart on their sleeves. It does frustrate me though all the silly penalties we give away especially double penalties, we need to build on this win and everyone give 110% that is all we can ask!

Re: v WAKEFIELD (H) : Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:02 pm  

Worst opposition performance I've seen since Bradford last year, and for me Quins looked alot better than the BBC match report and quite a long way better than the 40-22 scoreline suggests.

Being at the game and not having the benefit of the replays I was truly baffled by some of Robert Hicks decisions today and I am usually one who can see a penalty when it is there to be given, either for or against us, but today he threw me a few that I just couldn't see for the life of me. Two of the Wakey tries were for the weakest of penalties, one being or taken to long on the man after a dominant tackle, clearly Hicks didn't see the Wakey player suffer the dominant tackle is the only plausible explanation.

Re: v WAKEFIELD (H) : Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:09 pm  

turin wrote:

Try to ignore the abuse of 'quins have no fans and are badly run' from the wakey mob........ Let's face it wakey can't exactly spout crap about oppositions crowds and poorly managed clubs can they!

Rocks at bus windows, wrong strip, and a fine for GT, nice one thats role model stuff


Well done Quins.

Re: v WAKEFIELD (H) : Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:11 pm  

Londo06 wrote:

Worst opposition performance I've seen since Bradford last year, and for me Quins looked alot better than the BBC match report and quite a long way better than the 40-22 scoreline suggests.

Being at the game and not having the benefit of the replays I was truly baffled by some of Robert Hicks decisions today and I am usually one who can see a penalty when it is there to be given, either for or against us, but today he threw me a few that I just couldn't see for the life of me. Two of the Wakey tries were for the weakest of penalties, one being or taken to long on the man after a dominant tackle, clearly Hicks didn't see the Wakey player suffer the dominant tackle is the only plausible explanation.

We can be bad and very bad mate, and although i did not visit i did listen in and speak to friends at the game i would have to agree the score flattered Wakey.

Re: v WAKEFIELD (H) : Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:24 pm  

Incredible. At one point in the second half when Wakey's defence was laughable, I had to pinch myself that it wasn't US playing in sky blue. Some promising stuff at last. It was good to see the confidence flooding back as the game went on. Just as well when you consider the make up of 4 of the last 5 home games...

Re: v WAKEFIELD (H) : Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:29 pm  

Great performance. Thought JO'C played brilliantly, his tackling is getting better by each week. Good to see i only saw about two players in Randell and Bailey that were Aussies. Role on the wins!

Re: v WAKEFIELD (H) : Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:48 pm  

Two points and hopefully some confidence, however the handling errors and the number of penalties given away would have lost us the game against anyone else.


Oh and as for Aussies, there was a certain full back.