: Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:41 am  

Whilst I am as, if not more, annoyed than anyone one about the fixture switch, I would suggest that any attempt to occupy the Lexus would only alienate the club even more.
As I have mentioned, the North Stand is open for this game and therefore, would make a better venue for those who wished to protest.

The last thing the club, or in fact the supporters of the club want is for people to be ejected/banned from the Stoop.

As for banners......I suspect that if there was a 50ft one slagging off SKY, then it might well be 3ft, as it won't get any air-time from....er.....the very people it is slagging off.

: Thu Jun 04, 2009 8:44 am  

stormingbronco wrote:

meandering rambles of a throwback to '68

As it's highly unlikely QRL supporters could or would ever engage in an organised protest against the club or SKY, even if one were required or deemed productive can I suggest instead that you alter the wording on your "The end of the world is nigh" boards normally worn at speakers corner to whatever message you want to reflect your own brand of lunacy.

Again you won't get noticed on SKY as in general turkeys don't vote for Christmas........it will however give the rest of us something to laugh about in these bleak times.

: Thu Jun 04, 2009 8:47 am  

wire-quin wrote:

Seems the club sanctioned the fixture so Craig Spencer said on the radio tonight
They said they didn't expect many to be travelling-cheers Quins

Do Quins get any money from the travelling fans? No, so why should they care?
Do Sky get any money from travelling fans? No, so why should they care?

I reckon the only group interested would be Perpignan/Catalans and then would they rock the boat over 1000 travelling fans (£20k) when they risk the big money from Sky?

: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:37 am  

gutterfax wrote:

As for banners......I suspect that if there was a 50ft one slagging off SKY, then it might well be 3ft, as it won't get any air-time from....er.....the very people it is slagging off.

Sky's contract probably gives them authority to have anything they deem "offensive" (to themselves) to be removed.

: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:42 am  

BroncOnIon wrote:

Sky's contract probably gives them authority to have anything they deem "offensive" (to themselves) to be removed.

Not true....otherwise wiggy would have gone long ago

: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:55 am  

Hold up, where has the last few posts gone?

If "someone" know who is to blame for this fiasco they should be named and shamed regardless of who it is, many of our fans have either lost a large amount of money or will miss the game, the deserve the truth.

: Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:58 am  

Graeme what was the content. You must have read them to know they are missing

: Thu Jun 04, 2009 12:01 pm  

Briali1 wrote:

Graeme what was the content. You must have read them to know they are missing

I've seen them, I can't really say anything but don't worry, you haven't missed out on anything.

: Thu Jun 04, 2009 12:02 pm  

Briali1 wrote:

Graeme what was the content. You must have read them to know they are missing

Just me blowing off steam.....so move along, nothing to see here

: Thu Jun 04, 2009 12:12 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

Just me blowing off steam.....so move along, nothing to see here

No, you have been told what happened and who was responsible, those who are out of pocket deserve to know who to point the finger at.