: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:04 pm  

Oli has scored for Wakey at the Reds!

: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:00 pm  

This is the Wilkes who ran 70 yards to get on the end of Brough's break and score against us at Belle Vue, right?

: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:58 pm  

Mr Sheen wrote:

This is the Wilkes who ran 70 yards to get on the end of Brough's break and score against us at Belle Vue, right?

Only because we were completely incompetent in defense.

We had enough players back to stop that move.

And Brough only broke away because we messed up an attacking move.

: Fri Jul 31, 2009 10:42 pm  

PTB wrote:

And Brough only broke away because we messed up a attacking move.

Us?


















An attacking move?

: Fri Jul 31, 2009 10:50 pm  

Dave Lister wrote:

Us?


















An attacking move?

: Sat Aug 01, 2009 11:50 am  

Oh dear god, we really need some investment.

: Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:44 pm  

Dave Lister wrote:

Us?




An attacking move?

When you read that its a failed attacking move, it becomes more clear.

: Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:47 pm  

If we call another switch pass back inside by Gale on an unplanned move an attacking move then it was a failed attacking move. To me it was Gale throwing another pass that in this case O'C wasn't ready for. I think we are calling it an attacking move as it was 5 yards from there line! rather than the content of its structure

: Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:54 pm  

McDermott needs to be buying higher quality players than this one, imho.

: Sat Aug 01, 2009 2:07 pm  

wire-quin wrote:

If we call another switch pass back inside by Gale on an unplanned move an attacking move then it was a failed attacking move. To me it was Gale throwing another pass that in this case O'C wasn't ready for. I think we are calling it an attacking move as it was 5 yards from there line! rather than the content of its structure

summarised correctly, thanks.