: Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:00 pm  

stormingbronco wrote:

So would quitely suggest that 5000+ average gate and 6th+ finish is pie in the sky and always will be as long as we continue tobe linked to a club who cheat & lie in order to 'win'.

Yup, because of course that will be the sole reason the Rugby League teams gates will be down and our play off position compromised..........

If it will help your obsession and compulsion to continue to post despite leaving more times than Status Quo have reformed, I can always assist by deactivating your account..................the first step is always admitting you have a problem old chap.

: Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:48 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

Storminateacup and rupe1 are a perfect example of what the club don't need. So called "fans" who offer nothing but negativity......just because we play a style of football that isn't to their liking (or anyone else at the moment either)somewhere that isn't accessible by their zimmers or/and because we share a name with a union team.
Good luck for 2010 to all involved!

I think you will find that we are exactly what the club needs. You can dress it up as 'disloyal' as much as you want but the simple fact is that people like us no longer want to watch a product that we find distasteful and substandard. Take out people like us and you are left with 2000 odd performing seals who clap and cheer no matter what detritus is served up before them and a club that will die.

: Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:55 pm  

Homer wrote:

Yup, because of course that will be the sole reason the Rugby League teams gates will be down and our play off position compromised..........

If it will help your obsession and compulsion to continue to post despite leaving more times than Status Quo have reformed, I can always assist by deactivating your account..................the first step is always admitting you have a problem old chap.

Why bother with the account? Why no just deactivate stormingbronco (and rupe1) - I've some interesting suggestions as to how

: Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:25 pm  

The Chronicler of Chiswic wrote:

Why bother with the account? Why no just deactivate stormingbronco (and rupe1) - I've some interesting suggestions as to how

Why on earth should I be 'deactivated'? Because I don't live in Sealworld?

: Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:34 pm  

I have ben called some things in my life but performing seal

: Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:43 pm  

Rupe

for someone who has supposedly given up on what you call dis tatstefull and sub standard you always seem to have summat to say
If you are not watching anymore and have no interest in the "detrius" as you put it why do you put so much effort to commenting on here?
Even I am getting bored with you

Yep it has been a poor season, well second half of it, its sport, you pick a team and decide to support it, sign of a real supporter is one that follows a team through good and bad!!!
in otherwords, sod off and annoy other people

: Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:45 pm  

mickyb1234 wrote:

Rupe

for someone who has supposedly given up on what you call dis tatstefull and sub standard you always seem to have summat to say
If you are not watching anymore and have no interest in the "detrius" as you put it why do you put so much effort to commenting on here?
Even I am getting bored with you

Yep it has been a poor season, well second half of it, its sport, you pick a team and decide to support it, sign of a real supporter is one that follows a team through good and bad!!!
in otherwords, sod off and annoy other people

No a real supporter will campaign for change if it will improve the club.

: Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:59 pm  

I don't how Rupe and Bronco will know if the club has improved if they don't go - maybe they will ask the seals for a morsel of news.

No imput - no output.

Haven't they got anything better to do? as the real London RL world is not good enough for them. They are such curiosities that they should be put on exhibition with the chocolate teapots.

: Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:02 pm  

stormingbronco wrote:

Chairman Hughes and his 'board' are unable to invest YET equally unwilling or should that be unable to bring in 'new' money.

Is that the same Chairman Hughes and board who, intially with the help of IL, have underwritten us by large sums since the Quins tie up, and who lost £1.5m when Broncos went under plus all the money they had subsidised that club by?

All is far from well at Quins but it would be a lot worse if David Hughes walked away. As for being unable to bring in new money, given the problems IL has had getting rid of his shares I'd suggest that may be down to a lack of interest. "Please buy these shares, all you have to do is underwrite the club by a few hundred grand a year, oh and then get criticised for not spending enough." Can't think why they ain't queueing up for that offer.......

: Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:38 pm  

Halfdan of t'wide embrace wrote:

Is that the same Chairman Hughes and board who, intially with the help of IL, have underwritten us by large sums since the Quins tie up, and who lost £1.5m when Broncos went under plus all the money they had subsidised that club by?

All is far from well at Quins but it would be a lot worse if David Hughes walked away. As for being unable to bring in new money, given the problems IL has had getting rid of his shares I'd suggest that may be down to a lack of interest. "Please buy these shares, all you have to do is underwrite the club by a few hundred grand a year, oh and then get criticised for not spending enough." Can't think why they ain't queueing up for that offer.......

The thought of subsidising 0 tries a season Jon Wells for another year probably sickens them.