Howell knocked Randall over after bouncing off Leuluai. Why was Howell trying to tackle Leuluai when he didn't have the ball? Don't agree with you on that one at all.

Only seen it once so could be wrong. Would have to check again tbh. You could argue it all day - why was Leuluai running into Howell when he didn't have the ball?

if it's nowhere near the play then it's play on anyway. Its also a prime example of the player committing to a tackle before the man gets the ball.

I'm not saying its obstruction. I'm saying a player is getting taken out off the ball, when it is nowhere near the play - where it happens is not relevent in this case.



I'll watch it again and will happily correct myself but from what I saw last night, IMO Leuluai took the players out, regardless of their attempts to make the tackle. What could they have done? Stood there and got poleaxed? Moved out of the way?

Its in the rules that players can run dummy lines, the ball was passed behind leuleui so there was no obstruction and therefore a fair try. It was the quins player who bought the dummy and went for dummy runner instead of the player with the ball.



I mean get real, you should know the rules

I am aware of the rules, I understand dummy lines, I understand the fact it was passed behind Leuluai, I understand where was no obstruction, all I am saying is from the ONE time I have seen this on the TV, it looked like Leuluai took a man out off the ball. As I have said, if this isn't the case and the players were drawn to Leuluai and not the other way around, then i'll hold my hands up.

Having calmed down since last night, I don't think anyone was particularly at fault and we were just outclassed on the day. Looking forward to next week and beyond already

Back early from Bradford Rigsby

In the wild and wacky world that's London RL, it wouldn't suprise me if we put 60 past Wakey next Sunday.

thats cause i never went..illness has struck me...

The Rhinos were to good its as simple as that for me.