Re: v WIDNES (a) : Sun Feb 16, 2014 9:18 pm  

Chris Dalton wrote:

so maybe he's not looking to be too honest about the reality of the situation which I can understand.

when you find yourself with an hour or so to Kill CD, can I recommend a search of the BBC sports site for Post-Match comments from Rea........Klingon is more decipherable

Re: v WIDNES (a) : Sun Feb 16, 2014 9:26 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

when you find yourself with an hour or so to Kill CD, can I recommend a search of the BBC sports site for Post-Match comments from Rea........Klingon is more decipherable

You're saying the man is a petaq?

Re: v WIDNES (a) : Sun Feb 16, 2014 9:34 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

when you find yourself with an hour or so to Kill CD, can I recommend a search of the BBC sports site for Post-Match comments from Rea........Klingon is more decipherable

No. no it is not Klingon but Teflon Tony!

Re: v WIDNES (a) : Sun Feb 16, 2014 9:42 pm  

A heavier defeat than would have liked to see. Probably 3 more in this group of games. However we have the next group to look forward to. Wonder what the teams confidence will be like now.

Next week could be worse than I originally envisaged.add another 20?

Re: v WIDNES (a) : Sun Feb 16, 2014 9:55 pm  

Chris Dalton wrote:

With all due respect to him for what he's facing he is talking out of his backside if he thinks Kev Brown was the only real difference between the teams. We were at a canter and whilst he was our MOM there were a good few difference makers like Tickle and Mellor and a general feeling that if you upped your game, we could've upped ours a lot more than we did. It was like a friendly.

Still the man has a real uphill battle right now so maybe he's not looking to be too honest about the reality of the situation which I can understand.

Dead right. Rea is expert at talking complete gibberish. How many do you think Wigan, Saints or Leeds would gave scored today?

Re: v WIDNES (a) : Sun Feb 16, 2014 9:58 pm  

Euclid wrote:

Dead right. Rea is expert at talking complete gibberish. How many do you think Wigan, Saints or Leeds would gave scored today?

We ourselves had half a team missing. A full strength Leeds would've hit 100 if they'd gone for it. I take no pleasure in saying that, but it's true. It's a cobbled together outfit, you can't expect anything better right now.

Re: v WIDNES (a) : Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:04 pm  

Southern Reiver wrote:

A heavier defeat than would have liked to see.

Actually, pretty much what the saner London fans amongst us predicted.

Southern Reiver wrote:

Probably 3 more in this group of games.

agreed.

Southern Reiver wrote:

However we have the next group to look forward to.

Leeds and Wigan away should carry a health warning.....Castleford will beat us easily, so Wakefield are the only hope.

Southern Reiver wrote:

Wonder what the teams confidence will be like now.

Shot to bits......

Southern Reiver wrote:

Next week could be worse than I originally envisaged.add another 20?

Salford will be licking their lips at the thought of easy meat next week.

Re: v WIDNES (a) : Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:19 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

Wakefield are the only hope.

I'd agree about the health warning on Leeds and Wigan games. However I doubt Wakefield will be much less of a repeat of today. If we're lucky at this point half of it.

Re: v WIDNES (a) : Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:21 pm  

Gutted to see this result, I'd count London as my third team after Saints and Salford and always look out for the results. Hopefully bringing in a little more experience in the likes of Farrar will help steady things up a little but by the looks of it relegation is most certainly on the cards. May not necessarily be such a bad thing for London Broncos but I think it would be for Rugby League in London, I just hope that if it does happen it's with a battle rather than a landslide.

On a side note, for anyone who made the long journey, how did Carl Forster go for you lot?

Re: v WIDNES (a) : Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:40 pm  

I am not convinced that LB are doing anything for RL in london