Re: Hornets : Tue Mar 28, 2017 6:02 am  

Could be a good idea, but last thing we want to do is end up like rugby yawnion, quite rightly they have cracked down but the way they interpreted it has made it nearly unworkable. The "game" RFL has asked the refs to clamp down on moving off the mark at the ptb, I think they have been extremely pedantic at time, maybe the emphasis should be shifted but let's not forget it would involve all players and broncos are not whiter than white here so as long as there is no complaining when we are on the receiving end of sanctions, funny how no one on here called for London player to be sin binned after an opposition player went off the field injured after an alleged tip and spear tackle!

Re: Hornets : Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:50 am  

mickyb1234 wrote:

funny how no one on here called for London player to be sin binned after an opposition player went off the field injured after an alleged tip and spear tackle!

This is the London forum Micky - what do you want?

Re: Hornets : Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:28 pm  

Hey Rob, well occasionally taking of the broncos tinted spectacles now and again from some. Yeah yeah yeah I know the rugby world is against us.

Re: Hornets : Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:16 pm  

London player to be sin binned after an opposition player went off the field injured after an alleged tip and spear tackle!

I dont remember seeing this but if it is right then yes he should have been sin binned all I am asking for is equal treatment and protection for players from all fields.

Re: Hornets : Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:20 pm  

Are upu suggesting that we get different treatment by officialsthan other teams? That's utter rubbish. What was the penalty count on Sunday? If I read right it was massively in our favour, that suggests we were getting penalties when we deserved them. A theme so far on our season has been us giving away too many penalties, yes I do keep a count of penalties during the games and what for! Trust me we put in our fair share of high shots, funny though I have very seldom seen anyone worrying about opposition player safety! So actually in general it is pretty equal.

Re: Hornets : Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:32 pm  

Read what I said I want equal treatment for all players from all clubs I did not say London were any different to anyone else, I did not indicate I wanted more for London or we were treated differently. Read what I write not what you want to see that is what causes the problems.

Re: Hornets : Tue Mar 28, 2017 7:07 pm  

The point i am making is there us equal treatment for all players! The officials penalise high shots, they use further sanctions for those that need it. Where is the evidence there us no equal treatment? You saw one thing on Sunday, another poster saw it differently obviously the match officials did not see anything that needed anything more than penalties.

Re: Hornets : Tue Mar 28, 2017 8:22 pm  

Anyhow it's done now

Let's look forward to what the boys can do on Sunday, hopefully they can put in a decent performance on the grass for a change

Re: Hornets : Wed Mar 29, 2017 5:46 pm  

Agree with itsmeagain - again

Re: Hornets : Thu Mar 30, 2017 3:46 pm  

Itsmeagain, by saying you what equal treatment and protection for all players, you must be suggesting that as you see it at the moment there is not equal treatment! Hence the confusion. So where do you think there is not equal treatment? If the officials ping both teams for the same offence is equal. The fact one team might be commuting that offence more does not make it unequal, it means the laws of the game are being applied. What we see on the terraces as bad contact with the head can be seen totally different from 15 Mtrs away and what we see as a yellow card offence from 50/60/70 Mtrs away is actually pretty innocuous when much closer.
Just trying to get where you are saying there is unequal treatment?