As far as I can tell money has been spent on marketing, with full page spreads in local papers and leaflets for both Barnet and Broncos. That Broncos are at the hive has had good press and local tv coverage but crowds are poor. GF is right to ask how this money was/ will be spent but without having any idea of how much money was provided to the hive or evidence that the hive have not spent the money on its intended purpose then I find it hard to claim its a bribe. Was it an enticement to ensure the deal happened? Of cause it was, who benefits if the money spent pays off? Everyone involved, but most especially the fans and the reputation of RL in london. No one benefits from it's failure to attract fans. GF is only turning his guns on this money as the argument that loads of people would pay to go and see Broncos at the Hive has fallen flat and no longer supports his theory that TK has been given a license to print money. That the Hive is closing sections of the stadia to cut costs is a clear indication to me that the Broncos at the Hive is not a money spinner.
So what do you do? Spend a fortune on marketing and get next to nothing back or wait until you have some results on the pitch and a sellable product. Lets be honest about this, most Bronco fans think their team are a dead duck so why should non fans be interested and going to see a team get battered is not a good advert to get them coming back. Giving away free
tickets has a limited benefit and generally devalues the product.
Bottom line is the move to the Hive has not proved as attractive to fans as those brokering the deal had hoped and building a new support base will not happen overnight. Whether the numbers eventually prove enough to make broncos viable is doubtful, I doubt anyone will be spending big on marketing as you are all shouting for as recent history has shown diminishing returns.
I'm sure there are those saying we should've stayed at the Stoop but the deal on the table was Hive or nothing. I get the impression that a fair number would've preferred the later.