Is Orr the new Hill? : Sat Apr 25, 2009 2:52 pm  

Just remember last season, Hill was brilliant for us, when he played the whole match. But when he played a part of the match, then went off we fell apart.
We play good without Orr playing a part at all.
We play good when Orr plays the whole game.
We play poorly when Orr plays half the game, and then gets taken off.
What does everyone else think??

Re: Is Orr the new Hill? : Sat Apr 25, 2009 10:46 pm  

tim791 wrote:

Just remember last season, Hill was brilliant for us, when he played the whole match. But when he played a part of the match, then went off we fell apart.
We play good without Orr playing a part at all.
We play good when Orr plays the whole game.
We play poorly when Orr plays half the game, and then gets taken off.
What does everyone else think??

We wee bloody awful without Orr last week!

[brian2]

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:12 am  

But brilliant without him on Friday................

Only proves that nothing is predictable apart from our unpredictability.....

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 12:13 pm  

I think that Orr probably has more influence over our game than Scotty Hill did.

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:29 pm  

Surreyben wrote:

I think that Orr probably has more influence over our game than Scotty Hill did.

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 4:45 pm  

Where were you Fri-Listy

You missed a cracker

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:51 pm  

wire-quin wrote:

Where were you Fri-Listy

You missed a cracker

Only got back from USA Thursday afternoon - was in Maidstone at the time, shocking jet lag.

: Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:22 pm  

Id have Orr over Hill any day of the week.

: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:09 pm  

Tre Cool wrote:

Id have Orr over Hill any day of the week.

im torn between the two. Orr seems to be getting injured alot now just like Hill, =]

: Fri Aug 21, 2009 9:20 pm  

Tre Cool wrote:

Id have Orr over Hill any day of the week.

<splutter>