Re: Powell crusher : Sat Apr 16, 2022 7:00 am  

sergeant pepper wrote:

Is that ironic with your username?

I'll admit that I'm a product of my generation. Guys like Skerrett and Cowie when I was growing up were legends. You knew at the game they'd get into the opposition players. Late and high shots, biff and general poop housing.

Nickle would do the same and I'd love to see how the game would play out when he did.

I see you haven't reached that level yet

Re: Powell crusher : Sat Apr 16, 2022 7:05 am  

warrior1872 wrote:

People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones,Saints have had plenty of players over the years who have overstepped the mark,most notably Sonny Nickle,now going back to the incident only an idiot would say it shouldn't have been a red although how LMS didn't get a yellow i don't know he must have run at least 10 yards to get involved

Spot on, maybe he did not give him a yellow because in doing so he would certainly have had to give Powell a red, which clearly he did not want to for whatever reason

Re: Powell crusher : Sat Apr 16, 2022 7:21 am  

chissitt wrote:

Spot on, maybe he did not give him a yellow because in doing so he would certainly have had to give Powell a red, which clearly he did not want to for whatever reason

I think LMS ran in because he saw a young lad on the end of a horrible tackle, one that could’ve caused serious damage. He’s protecting his team mate. I’m disappointed more of them didn’t do the same to be honest.

I’d be amazed if Powell doesn’t get at least 5 games.

Re: Powell crusher : Sat Apr 16, 2022 7:29 am  

I think the ref not sending Powell off is to do with the directives the officials have. I really can't remember many instances of tackles that fall under the umbrella of dangerous contact or undue pressure actually resulting in red cards. The Ferres tackle on Gildart resulted in a sin bin too despite being very clearly a dangerous tackle. I think it's because in most cases those challenges have to be looked at in depth to judge whether the attacking player contributed, whether other defending players contributed etc. For that reason the guidance seems to be all dangerous contact is a sin bin and the match review panel look at it in more depth. I can see things changing in the near future though.

He seems much maligned by Wigan fans but I don't mind him in terms of his playing ability, but one thing I don't like is that over the years he only seems to pick up bans for the nasty, niggly stuff. Canonball tackles, chicken wing tackles, undue pressure and now what's likely to be a long ban for a crusher tackle. I don't like that about players. It's not as easily excusable as being banned for the odd high tackle.

Re: Powell crusher : Sat Apr 16, 2022 7:53 am  

Stu M wrote:

I think LMS ran in because he saw a young lad on the end of a horrible tackle, one that could’ve caused serious damage. He’s protecting his team mate. I’m disappointed more of them didn’t do the same to be honest.

I’d be amazed if Powell doesn’t get at least 5 games.

I'm not questioning the intentions of LMS or his loyalty to his team mate commendable really, just that in the horror of the tackle to give him a yellow would have meant he'd have to send Powell off, and maybe the ref thought why spoil a good game completely as he'll get his come upence at the hearing, who knows

Re: Powell crusher : Sat Apr 16, 2022 8:20 am  

Sgt pepper I think you are defending the indefensible here. It was horrific to watch and clearly intentional. Bennison was already tackled. He quite intentionally picked him up off the floor to slam him back down. Whether he meant to do it as a crusher or not I don't know but he has form for bad tackles. He was trying to throw his weight around with a young lad and made himself look stupid. I don't care whether Peet says he is sorry and feels like he let the side and fans down because he did let everybody down. I hope he does feel like crap, not because we lost but for his shameful actions

Re: Powell crusher : Sat Apr 16, 2022 8:22 am  

Fantastic Mr Catpiss wrote:

Just so you know, you're making yourself sound worse with every post on this.

Yes, we all already got that you're a desperately proud wigan warriors fan. But even moreso, clearly a rubbish human being.

Embarrassing.

Thankfully he's in a minority of one with his opinion on this.

Thought better of Powell, he's a good bloke and he seems rightfully disappointed with his actions.

Re: Powell crusher : Sat Apr 16, 2022 8:25 am  

I must admit, at the time I didn’t think much of it and rather bizarrely didn’t even think it was a yellow - likely down to the amount of pints consumed!!

Now I’ve watched it back. Well I’m amazed it wasn’t a red. He is certainly no grub and I don’t think he ever meant to cause any harm or put Bennison at risk, let’s just have that right here. But he got it badly wrong and fully deserves the ban inbound.

That then opens the door for O’Neill or even Harry Smith dependant on who Peet chooses in the halves. A huge opportunity for one of them, if not both, to prove once and for all they belong in this team.

I too love the physicality and the biff. Lord only knows how many times I’ve watched the Good Friday brawl at Knowsley Road on repeat this week but actively praising that kind of play that puts a persons mobility at risk? Speechless. No room for that in our game whatsoever. Thankfully the poster appears to be in a small minority of buffoons.

Re: Powell crusher : Sat Apr 16, 2022 8:45 am  

Stu M wrote:

I think LMS ran in because he saw a young lad on the end of a horrible tackle, one that could’ve caused serious damage. He’s protecting his team mate. I’m disappointed more of them didn’t do the same to be honest.

I’d be amazed if Powell doesn’t get at least 5 games.

Let’s not mix up me criticising LMS here with me doing anything other than condemning the tackle but LMS runs in because he’s a grade A tit and he does things like that every week.

Poor tackle though and he’ll get some time sat down.

Re: Powell crusher : Sat Apr 16, 2022 8:55 am  

NickyKiss wrote:

Let’s not mix up me criticising LMS here with me doing anything other than condemning the tackle but LMS runs in because he’s a grade A tit and he does things like that every week.

Poor tackle though and he’ll get some time sat down.

He may be that but I’ll be blunt here, if that was LMS on one of our young lads (or any other player) I’d fully expect someone, I’d not all, to run in as well. Horrific tackle and I can’t sit here and condemn LMS for running in to be honest