Re: leeds match : Tue May 28, 2013 8:16 am  

Leeds Thirteen wrote:

Aye , late and on Sinfields blindside , same as Baileys pathetic push on Tomkins ( iirc ) , a pair of proper softcocks together .

Maybe next time McIlorum should stand in front of him and hand him a polite notice of intent to tackle?

Re: leeds match : Tue May 28, 2013 8:34 am  

People on twitter saying Micky Mac should be handed a 4 match ban for his 'shoulder charge' on Sinfield.

The game is going down the pan.

Re: leeds match : Tue May 28, 2013 9:15 am  

Bluenosewarrior wrote:

People on twitter saying Micky Mac should be handed a 4 match ban for his 'shoulder charge' on Sinfield.

The game is going down the pan.

Well, famous Wigan-hater Cummins didn't share that view, so it shows what side of the fence that bunch of idiots is sitting on.

Re: leeds match : Tue May 28, 2013 9:20 am  

Bluenosewarrior wrote:

People on twitter saying Micky Mac should be handed a 4 match ban for his 'shoulder charge' on Sinfield.

The game is going down the pan.

People on twitter...............enough said

Re: leeds match : Tue May 28, 2013 11:58 am  

Angelus wrote:

Maybe next time McIlorum should stand in front of him and hand him a polite notice of intent to tackle?

No intent to tackle , ball had gone . Actions of a softarse .

Re: leeds match : Tue May 28, 2013 12:19 pm  

Leeds Thirteen wrote:

No intent to tackle , ball had gone . Actions of a softarse .

Behave yourself.

The fact he had hold of the ball in the first place shows intent to tackle.

Re: leeds match : Tue May 28, 2013 12:20 pm  

Leeds Thirteen wrote:

No intent to tackle , ball had gone . Actions of a softarse .

Well, as you are speaking as a Leeds fan, we bow down to your knowledge... You know all about softarses...

Re: leeds match : Tue May 28, 2013 2:36 pm  

thought it was a cracking game, but for saying that we were missing five first-teamers (Peacock, Delaney, Ablett, Jones-Bishop & Ward), all of whom but Ward will be back for the playoffs, gives me reason to think we'll give you a good run come playoff time.

Also for those saying the LLS is yours, while I'd say its yours to lose, we have to games in hand we should win (Wakey away, Widnes at home) and still have to play you at your place. Last game of the season could still be the decider in that one.

Re: leeds match : Tue May 28, 2013 3:53 pm  

twosevenzero wrote:

People on twitter...............enough said

Your joking. I have far more intelligent debates via twitter than I've ever, ever had in 14 years knocking around on this forum.

Re: leeds match : Tue May 28, 2013 4:43 pm  

Thought we didn't use Charnley nearly enough. Not sure if that was through lack of Green's left to right passsing or because Josh was torn apart at Headingley but he wanted Hall badly. Seeing the "World's best winger" put on his backside shows what a gentle, public wind-up by SW mid-week can do.

Right about Green, Smith's all-round game is excellent but Green has that special something.

Considering it was from Mickey that shoulder charge could be described as a heavy tickle. I'm sure Sky were keen to blame injury when Kev was kicking so beautifully for Josh's try.