Re: Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE : Wed Mar 13, 2024 10:49 pm  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

What are you smoking?

If we barely a top 4 side then how does every bookie in the land have us 2nd favourites? Are they all wrong?

I’ll chew my own balls off if we don’t finish top 4.

Don't sweat it, this time last year he had Wigan down for mid-table obscurity at best

Re: Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE : Thu Mar 14, 2024 7:16 am  

I’m just looking forward to a good old GF game. Last few years, have been good but not great. Need one for the ages

Re: Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE : Thu Mar 14, 2024 7:16 am  

RobRiches wrote:

Redvee is full of toothless simpletons. They all just blindly think that St Helen’s are still the best team in SL when it’s clear to see they are a top 6 maybe top 4. Anyone who dares criticise on that forum is mocked.

It’s embarassing

Re: Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE : Thu Mar 14, 2024 8:48 am  

WWste wrote:

I’m just looking forward to a good old GF game. Last few years, have been good but not great. Need one for the ages

It's got the makings of an absolute belter of a game. I'm gutted we blew that last week against Salford as I genuinely wanted both teams to be going into GF unbeaten. Would've been a great marketing tool as well. I'm sure when the time comes, last week's defeat won't count for anything anyway.

It's an old cliche but I hope neither teams comes unstuck with silly bans over the next couple of weeks and we can both go at it full tilt on Good Friday. With a guaranteed sell out now it's going to be one hell of an atmosphere too.

Re: Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE : Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:12 am  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

What are you smoking?

If we barely a top 4 side then how does every bookie in the land have us 2nd favourites? Are they all wrong?

I’ll chew my own balls off if we don’t finish top 4.

lmao the bookies. The bookies know naff all about rugby league.

Scrape past london, Wigan blow them away with their reserve team.

Put on a half decent display against Hudds who were poor.

Scrape past leigh

Lose against Salford.

4 of the worst teams in super league and saints dont make any kind of statement.

Are they still jet lagged from the WCC? That was the excuse for the whole of last season

Re: Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE : Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:05 am  

RobRiches wrote:

lmao the bookies. The bookies know naff all about rugby league.

Scrape past london, Wigan blow them away with their reserve team.

Put on a half decent display against Hudds who were poor.

Scrape past leigh

Lose against Salford.

4 of the worst teams in super league and saints dont make any kind of statement.

Are they still jet lagged from the WCC? That was the excuse for the whole of last season

We beat Huddersfield 28-0. What was the Wigan score against them?

You really are special aren't you?

Re: Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE : Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:09 am  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

We beat Huddersfield 28-0. What was the Wigan score against them?

You really are special aren't you?

Mate don’t even bother

Re: Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE : Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:47 am  

The Yellow Giraffe wrote:

We beat Huddersfield 28-0. What was the Wigan score against them?

You really are special aren't you?

2 points
I think drawing a parallel with the 2 x Hudds results is a bit of a poor analogy for various reasons inc the timing of our game Vs Hudds (But to be honest comparing individual results is never a good thing in my book).

2nd point
Can't believe you've got involved and tried to make a reasoned argument to that Twonk, pillock, Troll (insert any one of a thousand names of your choosing).

Re: Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE : Thu Mar 14, 2024 12:09 pm  

Dunno, I don't mind comparing some results in side by side, for example we beat Penrith in the 80 minutes

Re: Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE : Thu Mar 14, 2024 12:23 pm  

Jukesays wrote:

2 points
I think drawing a parallel with the 2 x Hudds results is a bit of a poor analogy for various reasons inc the timing of our game Vs Hudds (But to be honest comparing individual results is never a good thing in my book).

2nd point
Can't believe you've got involved and tried to make a reasoned argument to that Twonk, pillock, Troll (insert any one of a thousand names of your choosing).

Agree on both. The latter I had no knowledge of until now.