Re: So who... : Fri Jan 27, 2012 9:46 pm  

SLIMply winning! wrote:

it appears your group facilitated the banning of one person by naming and shaming him to the club, did you do the same with the flare culprit by notifying the RFL or hull kr (was it there? can't remember specifics)

what do you mean by admonished?

Yes

If your that interested you (And anyone else) is more than welcome to our next meeting. Maybe you can pick up that Ultras Badge you've been PMing me about for the last 12 months?

(PS - My 1 and only post on this thread and it will be my last.)

Re: So who... : Sat Jan 28, 2012 12:14 pm  

SLIMply winning! wrote:

it appears your group facilitated the banning of one person by naming and shaming him to the club, did you do the same with the flare culprit by notifying the RFL or hull kr (was it there? can't remember specifics)

what do you mean by admonished?

Firstly, it wasn't a flare, and secondly, neither the RFL or Hull KR wanted to know his/her identity.

Re: So who... : Sat Jan 28, 2012 5:06 pm  

is this still going!?? Gonna end up like the Christ Joynt involuntary tackle thread!

Re: So who... : Sun Jan 29, 2012 3:27 pm  

Robbo wrote:

is this still going!?? Gonna end up like the Christ Joynt involuntary tackle thread!

Exactly, been dealt with, we're happy, the clubs happy, lets move on and concentrate on the coming season.

Re: So who... : Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:10 pm  

FIOS wrote:

I know this is completely unrelated but does anyone know if that guy is ok who was passed out on the floor just after the bridge after the game?

thanks for asking yes he's OK.

Re: So who... : Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:33 am  

twosevenzero wrote:

Firstly, it wasn't a flare, and secondly, neither the RFL or Hull KR wanted to know his/her identity.

it seems that most people are being evasive or obtuse, the point i was trying to make was that nobody informed or reported the name of the culprit at the hullkr match but chose to following the spray paint incident. double standards????
i don't know. just putting the question out there.
maybe i will attend one of your meetings, pick up my ultra badge for my collection and have a reasoned debate about rugby league in general, i work nights so will have to wait until my nights off match up with a meeting.
there appears to be a lot of defensive posting on here to what i feel are valid questions. i'm not critisizing the ultra's or what they try and do for their club... fair play to your enthusiasm. i just wondered about the real issues arround self policing and who has a say in the decision making process. flipant posts including posting a definition of a word rather than outlining what actual actions were taking just makes it look like you've got something to hide imo, or it hasn't been thought through and knee jerk reactions to each incident as and when it happens will be the order of the day.

Re: So who... : Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:38 am  

SLIMply winning! wrote:

flipant posts including posting a definition of a word rather than outlining what actual actions were taking just makes it look like you've got something to hide imo, or it hasn't been thought through and knee jerk reactions to each incident as and when it happens will be the order of the day.

I was not being flippant, and you have taken my post out of context. I stated that i am not a member of the group, and that action had supposedly been taken by the club, the club being WRLFC not the Ultras/brigantes, and that you should ask the club. Instead you have just kept banging on about this matter. The group cannot police anything, but seem to have helped the appropriate authorities when a very small problem arose. They did this instead of just being "Indignant of Wigan" on a website.

Re: So who... : Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:47 pm  

SLIMply winning! wrote:

it seems that most people are being evasive or obtuse, the point i was trying to make was that nobody informed or reported the name of the culprit at the hullkr match but chose to following the spray paint incident. double standards????i don't know. just putting the question out there.
maybe i will attend one of your meetings, pick up my ultra badge for my collection and have a reasoned debate about rugby league in general, i work nights so will have to wait until my nights off match up with a meeting.
there appears to be a lot of defensive posting on here to what i feel are valid questions. i'm not critisizing the ultra's or what they try and do for their club... fair play to your enthusiasm. i just wondered about the real issues arround self policing and who has a say in the decision making process. flipant posts including posting a definition of a word rather than outlining what actual actions were taking just makes it look like you've got something to hide imo, or it hasn't been thought through and knee jerk reactions to each incident as and when it happens will be the order of the day.

The name of the 'culprit' would have been given over the Hull KR incident but (as I put in the previous post) it was not wanted/needed/requested by their or Wigan's officials, as for the incident at the DW, the 'culprit' came forward and admitted what had happened and rang the club to offer to clean off the paint themselves, regarding what actions have been taken against the said 'culprit', this was considered not something to be published on an Internet forum but kept in house, if you really want to know, please attend the next meeting and we will attempt to answer all of your concerns, the matter is now over with, and both the 'Brigantes/Ultras and the club satisfied with the outcome.

Re: So who... : Mon Jan 30, 2012 2:32 pm  

twosevenzero wrote:

The name of the 'culprit' would have been given over the Hull KR incident but (as I put in the previous post) it was not wanted/needed/requested by their or Wigan's officials, as for the incident at the DW, the 'culprit' came forward and admitted what had happened and rang the club to offer to clean off the paint themselves, regarding what actions have been taken against the said 'culprit', this was considered not something to be published on an Internet forum but kept in house, if you really want to know, please attend the next meeting and we will attempt to answer all of your concerns, the matter is now over with, and both the 'Brigantes/Ultras and the club satisfied with the outcome.

Is he now sleeping with the fishes

Re: So who... : Mon Jan 30, 2012 2:43 pm  

FAXE LUCAS wrote:

Is he now sleeping with the fishes