Aboveusonlypie wrote:
Er...Crusaders. And...er (maybe Bradford?)
Considering most of the posters on here know more than anyone else about how to run a club - how about some supporter representation on the board? Or would they have to be "business people" as well as supporters?
Business people exist to make money. You can't make money out of Rugby League. Entrepreneurs are by their nature risk takers. If you want someone to take a risk with your club then be prepared to accept failure and financial ruin as a possibility.
I seem to remember Halifax, London, Gateshead and Paris all having financial problems too in Super League (and maybe Wakefield), but let's assume none of those were down to financial mismanagement at the clubs, and that it's actually only Crusaders and Bradford who've messed up. Two is not insignificant.
In principle, I don't oppose a salary cap, but I think modifications need to be made to try and bring in some degree of protection against those seeking to pilfer our best players.
Whether you'd agree with that or not, I don't know, but mocking the mere notion that good business people should have a place in Super League sounds a bit weird to me, given that the one thing you really want at a club is someone who can create financial security.