Re: Edwards provides clarity : Thu Mar 21, 2019 11:15 am  

RichieS wrote:

You really are very antagonistic. Quite easily my least favorite poster on here and I include Rubber Duckie in that

favourite is spelt with a 'U'.

Go back to making hypothetical posts and outlandish claims, it's what you're best at.

PS, your post just antagonised me, oh the irony.

Re: Edwards provides clarity : Thu Mar 21, 2019 11:21 am  

RichieS wrote:

You really are very antagonistic. Quite easily my least favorite poster on here and I include Rubber Duckie in that

Richie I agree. It’s not that long ago he referred to me as Big Red Throbber and I swore to myself I wouldn’t engage with him ever again. He’s incapable of entering a debate without resorting to personal insults. He ruins this forum for many people not just us but it’s a lesson learned for me. I shouldn’t have engaged with him.
What you’re likely to find is that he’ll come back with another ‘have to get the last word in’ insult. So be it.....

Re: Edwards provides clarity : Thu Mar 21, 2019 11:23 am  

Last Son of Wigan wrote:

favourite is spelt with a 'U'.

Go back to making hypothetical posts and outlandish claims, it's what you're best at.

PS, your post just antagonised me, oh the irony.

If a spelling error is all you managed to grasp from my post then I fear I did not antagonise you nearly as much as I intended.

You post to irritate, you attack any form of criticism/debate towards your posts and now you are verbally insulting someone simply because they honor their word. You are quite ridiculous.

Ps, I still stand by saying Danny Richardson is highly over rated

Re: Edwards provides clarity : Thu Mar 21, 2019 11:25 am  

Bigredwarrior wrote:

Richie I agree. It’s not that long ago he referred to me as Big Red Throbber and I swore to myself I wouldn’t engage with him ever again. He’s incapable of entering a debate without resorting to personal insults. He ruins this forum for many people not just us but it’s a lesson learned for me. I shouldn’t have engaged with him.
What you’re likely to find is that he’ll come back with another ‘have to get the last word in’ insult. So be it.....

Oh for gods sake how pathetic. You post 'I know something but I'm not telling you' comment and get called out on it, simple as that. What did you expect?

And big red throbber? don't be so bloody touchy it was only a joke.

PS your last line? Nice try.

Re: Edwards provides clarity : Thu Mar 21, 2019 11:27 am  

RichieS wrote:

If a spelling error is all you managed to grasp from my post then I fear I did not antagonise you nearly as much as I intended.

You post to irritate, you attack any form of criticism/debate towards your posts and now you are verbally insulting someone simply because they honor their word. You are quite ridiculous.

No sorry, I don't post to irritate, I just don't pull any punches when dealing with people who post hypotheticals or claim 'to be in the know' then fail to actually converse with others, it's ridiculous.

Re: Edwards provides clarity : Thu Mar 21, 2019 11:32 am  

tugglesf78 wrote:

I think you are correct

Gut feeling from me is that due to SE very public communications (however justified or unjustified) he can not now take the mantel as head coach. Any appointment made now lacks any real credibility.

What i can get my head around is why a very connected person like SE obviously is, he felt the need to broadcast his availability for potential new roles in the media? Id have thought he could just a have a few quiet words in a few interested ears and let the word get round that way.

Similarly if he was / is gagging for the Wigan job, why did he not just get on the blower to IL to sort?

There are ways to conduct yourself in public and im not sure i agree with SE conduct to be honest.

With regards to the blame. well i have no idea who is at fault so will wait for more information from the club and hope that it provides some clarity

To all those asking people to reveal sources and spill the beans. Regardless of legal implications (of which i bet there are a few), if somone has been told to keep a secret then FFS respect that.

If you are going to call out people credibility, does it some how make them more credible if they talk details?

no it does not

This is just a forum where us fans chat about the club, its not the junior bloody detective agency. Its just a bit of fun chatting rugby, that all

I spoke to someone as close to SE as you can get without being SE himself and he says that SE has acted professionally in all this and is in the right.

I'm not going to say what he said I'm just going to keep telling everyone SE is right.

See what I did there? Could be true, could be BS and seeing as I'm not going to say anything nobody will ever know.

If I had been told something in confidence then I probably wouldn't tell everyone I'd been told something in the first place.

Re: Edwards provides clarity : Thu Mar 21, 2019 11:35 am  

Egg Chasing wrote:

I spoke to someone as close to SE as you can get without being SE himself and he says that SE has acted professionally in all this and is in the right.

I'm not going to say what he said I'm just going to keep telling everyone SE is right.

See what I did there? Could be true, could be BS and seeing as I'm not going to say anything nobody will ever know.

If I had been told something in confidence then I probably wouldn't tell everyone I'd been told something in the first place.

Exactly!! A poster who speaks sense.

Re: Edwards provides clarity : Thu Mar 21, 2019 11:37 am  

Last Son of Wigan wrote:

No sorry, I don't post to irritate, I just don't pull any punches when dealing with people who post hypotheticals or claim 'to be in the know' then fail to actually converse with others, it's ridiculous.

No mate. You're aggressive even when your own argument has no more validity than the opposing one. You rarely fail to resort to personal insults or personal criticism and I've yet to see you admit to, let alone apologise for, being wrong.

Hiding behind the 'I pull no punches' argument only really works if you're equally hard on yourself. Otherwise it's little more than being argumentative for its own sake.

Re: Edwards provides clarity : Thu Mar 21, 2019 11:37 am  

RichieS wrote:

If a spelling error is all you managed to grasp from my post then I fear I did not antagonise you nearly as much as I intended.

You post to irritate, you attack any form of criticism/debate towards your posts and now you are verbally insulting someone simply because they honor their word. You are quite ridiculous.

Ps, I still stand by saying Danny Richardson is highly over rated

Oh right, editing bits on at the end of past posts? So what is Richardson's rating? If you think he's overrated? Last time I checked he was a dropped player who's applying his trade in the championship with Leigh.

Re: Edwards provides clarity : Thu Mar 21, 2019 11:40 am  

Phuzzy wrote:

No mate. You're aggressive even when your own argument has no more validity than the opposing one. You rarely fail to resort to personal insults or personal criticism and I've yet to see you admit to, let alone apologise for, being wrong.

Hiding behind the 'I pull no punches' argument only really works if you're equally hard on yourself. Otherwise it's little more than being argumentative for its own sake.

Pot. Kettle. Black.

Typical Phil jumping in when he's sees a poster already being attacked.

And aggressive? I'm as calm as the day is long. That's clearly your interpretation, I could say the same about you. But as you've posted nothing about Wigan or RL in your post to me I'll assume you don't want to talk about either?

Seems more of a personal attack. How ironic.