DaveO wrote:
Don’t be so ridiculous. Address the point I made rather than making up straw man arguments you can agree with. I did not compare his tenure to DW’s. I said I don’t like one man owning the club regardless of if is DW or IL so a new stakeholder is a good thing. It’s a positive development.
Yet here you are coming out with nonsense saying it’s an insult to compare their stewardship which I didn’t do so you can have a pop which you obviously could not wait to do. It’s transparently obvious. Grow up.
Save your breath, IL like Whelan at the Latics can do no wrong with some supporters and I agree with you it is not ideal to have one person owning a club as all decisions are made by that one person, even if a decision might not be right or beneficial to the club. Examples being the loss making decisions by IL for the game at Millwall and the trip down under to Sydney which no doubt has been the reason for some of the poorer signings in the last couple of seasons or so as a result of how the two decisions have hit the finances of the the club. The two loss making ventures also have not been helped by the club having to move its HQ to Robin Park and the cost of upgrading the facility and now on top the pandemic which has made the financial situation worse.
Perhaps this the reason for a new investor in Mike Danson has been invited to come in and buy part of IL's 79% shareholding of the club.
