Re: come on wigan : Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:51 pm  

Conroy wrote:

the-Bowtun-Warrior wrote:

Creaming over a 40-20. LOL. Sounds a right ****

He's trying to build the prospect of a giant killing. Doing a great job imo.


Hocky should get banned for that. Dirty nice bloke throwing the ball in the crowd.

Not a problem Adam.
My opinion on his 'performance' tonight is a little different.

Re: come on wigan : Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:52 pm  

Only Just Girls!

Re: come on wigan : Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:53 pm  

Laughing now you hve won , but don't kid yourselves that you weren't run close . Best game I seen in a long time .
Well done Fev . Awesome effort .
Congrats to Wigan on the win .

Re: come on wigan : Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:55 pm  

BaldRick wrote:

Laughing now you hve won , but don't kid yourselves that you weren't run close . Best game I seen in a long time .
Well done Fev . Awesome effort .
Congrats to Wigan on the win .

I thought it was an excellent game. Full credit to Fev, they've put in a great interview for SL

Re: come on wigan : Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:56 pm  

They ran us a lot closer than most Super League sides this season but I don't think the result was ever in doubt, even when they went 12-10 up.

Re: come on wigan : Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:59 pm  

Terrific game. I see most of this thread is complaining about the refs, and Fev did get a couple of charitable calls from the VR in the first half but good god the directive must have gone to down to Silverwood in the last quarter to make absolutly sure Wigan won it.

Re: come on wigan : Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:00 pm  

We made way too many errors. Without them, Fev wouldn't have been close. Fairplay to fev for digging in and sticking with us though.

Re: come on wigan : Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:02 pm  

chill out guys. i think the only ridiculous decision was sam not tackled in the air. everything else was reasonable, i thought gellings first attempt was a try, but in full speed it did seem raynor grounded it. the fev tries were reasonable. hocks obstruction would not have surprised me had it gone either way, but im not sure anyone truly understands that rule anymore so hell if i know.

Re: come on wigan : Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:04 pm  

the wrestler wrote:

chill out guys. i think the only ridiculous decision was sam not tackled in the air. everything else was reasonable, i thought gellings first attempt was a try, but in full speed it did seem raynor grounded it. the fev tries were reasonable. hocks obstruction would not have surprised me had it gone either way, but im not sure anyone truly understands that rule anymore so hell if i know.

What about the ball steal on Finch in the lead-up to Raynor's try?

Re: come on wigan : Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:04 pm  

Well Done Featherstone . I think there should be a few questions asked about the the link between the ref and the video ref , and the refereeing in general