Wire_91 wrote:its your first final in about 8 years and now you ravin and rantin about it F**k off, and ill be going old trafford tomoz cheering on the saints and ill be writing on this forum givin you loads of shi* when your drying you eyes and the wire fan will be here handing out the tissues in the thousands, thats if you do take that many fans cause now it looks like its your fans who have jumped on the band wagon now your in a final, this time last year there was only 1000 people in the jjb and now its fillin up cause youve won the league hahaha proper true supporters you are
Without making any comments about his character, it's just poor allocation of resources in a salary capped sport to have one of your top earners never playing in his proper position. You could even argue the same for French, but at least he can be a major threat playing his natural game out on the wing - just not quite as much as if he were full back.
Hardaker is still an excellent full back, but only an above average centre/winger. If we can spend his wage on a younger, specialist replacement, then it's a no brainer.
I'm not going to make any sweeping statements about him, from what I could see the club have handled it, Hardaker made a comment to suggest he's gonna get his head down in training, onwards and upwards.... etc. He's still an integral part of our structure, let's get him playing until the end of the season and play his contract out.
If however we continue to have him sidelined or there's additional issues then that's another matter, but until then lets give him our support.
I'm not going to make any sweeping statements about him, from what I could see the club have handled it, Hardaker made a comment to suggest he's gonna get his head down in training, onwards and upwards.... etc. He's still an integral part of our structure, let's get him playing until the end of the season and play his contract out.
If however we continue to have him sidelined or there's additional issues then that's another matter, but until then lets give him our support.
I haven’t got a clue if the rumours are true or not but to me signing a player on loan who has “history” with the club (Leeds) at the same time of just announcing a new coach from Australia seems a little implausible.
I haven’t got a clue if the rumours are true or not but to me signing a player on loan who has “history” with the club (Leeds) at the same time of just announcing a new coach from Australia seems a little implausible.
Leeds chief executive Gary Hetherington was asked about the 30-year-old during his recent press conference. He responded: “We’re in a situation where we’re looking any player that can add value.
“We don’t need me to talk about the virtues of Zak Hardaker; he’s an outstanding player.
“We have been scouring the market just to see what players may be available and indeed if the club will release them and if we have enough space on our own cap.
“There’s quite a lot of decisions to be made there. Such as our plight, we have 10 players missing, so we are looking to make things happen.
“We’re grateful for any quality player who may be available.”
Itchy Arsenal wrote:
I haven’t got a clue if the rumours are true or not but to me signing a player on loan who has “history” with the club (Leeds) at the same time of just announcing a new coach from Australia seems a little implausible.
Leeds chief executive Gary Hetherington was asked about the 30-year-old during his recent press conference. He responded: “We’re in a situation where we’re looking any player that can add value.
“We don’t need me to talk about the virtues of Zak Hardaker; he’s an outstanding player.
“We have been scouring the market just to see what players may be available and indeed if the club will release them and if we have enough space on our own cap.
“There’s quite a lot of decisions to be made there. Such as our plight, we have 10 players missing, so we are looking to make things happen.
“We’re grateful for any quality player who may be available.”
If we can replace him let him go, if we can’t don’t.
Given our quota status though I don’t see how we can replace him with a better player.
Wardle, Newman, Percival King etc are not going to be allowed to move can’t see Gildart coming home till end of the year at least and we can’t look overseas unless we offload a player (Miski).
Let him go at the end of the year, absolutely and we have no choice anyway but I don’t see how we can let him go yet and improve the squad.
If we can replace him let him go, if we can’t don’t.
Given our quota status though I don’t see how we can replace him with a better player.
Wardle, Newman, Percival King etc are not going to be allowed to move can’t see Gildart coming home till end of the year at least and we can’t look overseas unless we offload a player (Miski).
Let him go at the end of the year, absolutely and we have no choice anyway but I don’t see how we can let him go yet and improve the squad.
Surely that depends on whether or not his relationship with the coach has completely malfunctioned? If all he's doing is causing trouble, then we might be better off without him.
That said, it could be a strategy ... to make himself such a pain that we let him go without asking anyone to stump up what's left of his contract. So maybe it's best if he just sits out the rest of 2022. (I'd be damned if I let Hetherington have him for nothing, when he's technically still got 6 months to run).
I don't know what Zak's issues are, by the way ... I'm only responding to some of the stories on here.