CM Punk wrote:
Could it be worthwhile trying McIlorum at 13 when O'Loughlin is either unavailable or needed in the backs?
I don't see the logic in that. His role there would be purely defensive, as he's not big enough to make strong carries like a forward and he's not really a ball player either. He's also not the most dangerous runner, like a Roby or Clark, so there isn't even a significant running threat. I know that coaches often put a strong defender at 13 and they don't always make a huge number of carries, but usually they'll pick someone who can still make an impact in the limited carries they make.
I don't see what McIlorum offers at 13 that someone like Joel Tomkins, Tautai or Gregson couldn't.