: Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:36 am  

The Angry Pirate wrote:

Not looking for an argument (or abuse.. ), but just to say that salary cap space for Myler, if the rumour is at all true, would not be a problem and certainly wouldn't result in Morley being released.

We released Gleeson and Reardon, both of who commanded fairly sizeable salaries, and have replaced with Mathers and Carney, not exactly breaking the bank... ....Carney most probably for just this season too.

Realistically, if we have to release a player to make way for Myler, then Morley would be towards the bottom of the list.....Rauhihi, Briers, Monaghan, in that order would be well ahead of Morley.

You may be right, you may not.

This is no less guesswork than that put forward by the usual rumour-mongers on this thread.

: Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:36 am  

Ashton Warrior wrote:

Mathers, Carney - Are Wire the next Huddersfield with all our rejects

Actually I think there are identical Mathers twins separated at birth, you signed the one that had never seen a rugby ball before we signed the other one.
As to the next Hudds and your rejects, looking at the league table you might have done better not to have rejected them

: Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:38 am  

PsychoBabble wrote:

Actually I think there are identical Mathers twins separated at birth, you signed the one that had never seen a rugby ball before we signed the other one.
As to the next Hudds and your rejects, looking at the league table you might have done better not to have rejected them

: Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:40 am  

PsychoBabble wrote:

Actually I think there are identical Mathers twins separated at birth, you signed the one that had never seen a rugby ball before we signed the other one.
As to the next Hudds and your rejects, looking at the league table you might have done better not to have rejected them

I think its more to do with the coaches then the players

: Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:43 am  

jonh wrote:

:oops:

Fairplay to you sir!

: Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:45 am  

Ashton Warrior wrote:

I think its more to do with the coaches then the players

Very possibly but I was aiming for comedy effect, you keep lobbing them up and I'll volley them!

: Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:52 am  

ABP' wrote:

The same was said about Gleeson and Fielden, but it happened.

Deep down you know it can happen, hence you're trying hide your fear with humour.

Fielden maybe - but that happened because you grossly overpaid in salary and transfer fee. As for Gleeson, we'd already confirmed months before he wanted out.

Put it this way, I can't see Morley being released to join Wigan, however if you're going to treat us to another Gleeson type deal...

: Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:55 am  

Ian [77] wrote:

Fielden maybe - but that happened because you grossly overpaid in salary and transfer fee. As for Gleeson, we'd already confirmed months before he wanted out.

Put it this way, I can't see Morley being released to join Wigan, however if you're going to treat us to another Gleeson type deal...

luckily for you lot theres only 1 mathers

: Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:58 am  

Ian [77] wrote:

Fielden maybe - but that happened because you grossly overpaid in salary and transfer fee. As for Gleeson, we'd already confirmed months before he wanted out.

Put it this way, I can't see Morley being released to join Wigan, however if you're going to treat us to another Gleeson type deal...

What if we offered a transfer fee? It can happen, anything can when it comes to player transfers.

Personally, I don't think there is any truth behind this one at all but I certainly wouldn't be suprised if it happened.

: Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:10 pm  

ABP' wrote:

The same was said about Gleeson and Fielden, but it happened.

Deep down you know it can happen, hence you're trying hide your fear with humour.

stop dreaming gleeson was released due to his drinkin antics with briers