: Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:41 pm  

RB wrote:

That would be just embarrassing.

why ?

: Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:44 pm  

Mother Feka wrote:

thanks, what a classic

You've gotta love that interview

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:51 am  

wigan_knight wrote:

why ?

Think about how many annoying people who know nothing about rugby at rugby games. Imagine if they had a microphone and were asked to talk about rugby, with a many tv viewers basing their opinion of rugby league on them. It would go well but they'd really have to check out which fans they picked.

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:43 am  

Cullen's "in depth" analysis was shocking.

"Here's why Huddersfield are better this year." It then cuts to a clip of Robinson pointing at Deacon and Wild running at him making yards.

Genius stuff, he could be on to something there!

Chariots isn't much better when he's on to be fair to the guy, but he can do no wrong in my eyes!

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 10:26 am  

We need a footy show type program. Cullen ironically is dire and Matin Offiah is not exactly TV presenter material either. An entertaining and funny show like the footy show is what we need

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:00 pm  

wigan_knight wrote:

Would be great if they had a panal and a fan from each side every week..like they did with football on sky

I think that shows why it may not be such a good idea.

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:07 pm  

RB wrote:

That would be just embarrassing.

Can't get anymore embarassing than it already is!

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:34 pm  

Grimmy wrote:

Think about how many annoying people who know nothing about rugby at rugby games. Imagine if they had a microphone and were asked to talk about rugby, with a many tv viewers basing their opinion of rugby league on them. It would go well but they'd really have to check out which fans they picked.

We have had annoying people who know nothing about the game commentate for almost 20 years.

I agree they would need to check the fans they pick.but there are some knowledgable fans out there..they just dont use this forum

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 4:30 pm  

Cullen is decent enough on the show tbh and Offiah is a breath of fresh air. Anything is better than Baz/Terry.

The real problem I have with all Skys coverage is Eddie Hemmings. He is so one eyed when it comes to Wigan its untrue, it would be preferable if he said nothing at all.

: Thu Mar 05, 2009 4:38 pm  

AJ wrote:

Cullen is decent enough on the show tbh and Offiah is a breath of fresh air. Anything is better than Baz/Terry.

The real problem I have with all Skys coverage is Eddie Hemmings. He is so one eyed when it comes to Wigan its untrue, it would be preferable if he said nothing at all.

Offiah just talks before he's thought about what he's going to say, but give him a bit of time and he'll be reet.

You're right about Hemmings though, he seems to be a bit nervous presenting the show, which is weird considering it's his job! Give it to Harry Gration!