Re: Bateman : Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:52 am  

Sounds like we will let Hastings go and replace his marquee status with Bateman. Not sure about having 2 marquee forwards, would rather have a decent centre or half. If Gildart goes we are really weak in the centres.

Re: Bateman : Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:01 am  

me neither

Re: Bateman : Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:08 am  

hatty wrote:

Nice to see Canberra getting a taste of their own medicine for a change.

Re: Bateman : Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:09 am  

They are going mad about it also, been arguing all morning, enjoying educating them

Re: Bateman : Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:45 am  

coming home

Re: Bateman : Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:19 pm  

Blueblood wrote:

coming home

Surely Bradford can't afford him?

Re: Bateman : Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:39 pm  

The hypocrisy of that rant by Ricky Stuart is unbelievable.

Re: Bateman : Tue Jun 30, 2020 1:09 pm  

MadDogg wrote:

The hypocrisy of that rant by Ricky Stuart is unbelievable.

It’s breathtaking isn’t it?

Re: Bateman : Tue Jun 30, 2020 1:47 pm  

We all go to work for money and he has publicly stated he is earning what he can to support/provide for his child. I applaud him for that even if it means he doesnt come back here

Re: Bateman : Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:24 pm  

[Gareth] wrote:

We all go to work for money and he has publicly stated he is earning what he can to support/provide for his child. I applaud him for that even if it means he doesnt come back here

I agree but being closer (in distance) to his daughter will also be a BIG factor.