: Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:03 pm  

LFCRhino wrote: LA RAMS again anybody ??? http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d ... nfirm=true How about Jacksonville ?

LFCRhino wrote: LA RAMS again anybody ??? http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d ... nfirm=true How about Jacksonville ?

: Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:19 pm  

Oakland?? Al Davis getting as much money as he can??

: Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:32 pm  

Dead Man Walking wrote:

How about Jacksonville ?

I have heard a lot of people mention them too!!!

oggy123 wrote:

Oakland?? Al Davis getting as much money as he can??

I would have thought they will definately be one of the names on the list to be fair, although Al Davis would probably not be welcomed back to L.A.

I have read that the Vikings may also be a possibility because they are having serious problems getting permission to build a new stadium

: Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:52 pm  

If anybody it will be Jacksonville.

IIRC they haven't sold out any games this year and some/all are blacked out. Plus with Miami and Tampa in the state it is possible they could move. The only possible reason i could see them staying is if they get Tebow in the draft. He is a massive marketing tool, particularly in Florida.

Buffalo will go to Toronto if anywhere.


Fantasy team for this week.

Conroy's Colts
QB- Peyton Manning
RB- Ladainian Tomlinson
RB- Laurence Maroney
WR- Donald Driver
WR- Marques Colston
WR- Sidney Rice
TE- Jason Witten
K- Nick Folk
DST- Packers

: Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:54 pm  

Apprently Arnie's said he would prefer that the LA franchise doesn't come from within Cali. That would count out the likes of the Raiders, 49ers and Chargers. I am nervy about the SD link though.

: Fri Oct 23, 2009 3:07 pm  

RedTez wrote:

Apprently Arnie's said he would prefer that the LA franchise doesn't come from within Cali. That would count out the likes of the Raiders, 49ers and Chargers. I am nervy about the SD link though.

The L.A Lightning (Bolts)
or
California Chargers


I'd be very surpised if it was San Diego

: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:53 pm  

I'm taking the risk of not playing Peterson this week because he is up against the Steelers defence. I have two other RBs Barber and Stewart who are predicted more points against weaker defences. Anybody else think this is a good idea or should I play Peterson?

: Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:45 am  

How embarrasing is this NFL uk program on channel 5 all the presenters are clueless when it comes to the NFL and it shows

Trevor Nelson What a tit Im guessing hes a Pats fan now even though he wasnt a few years ago and said he was a Tampa bay fan


Apparently Antonio Bryant is world class and one of the best wideouts in the league now too

: Sat Oct 24, 2009 12:23 pm  

And the bloody camera never stays still. It's like the cameraman is drunk or something.

: Sat Oct 24, 2009 12:51 pm  

onewild wrote:

I'm taking the risk of not playing Peterson this week because he is up against the Steelers defence. I have two other RBs Barber and Stewart who are predicted more points against weaker defences. Anybody else think this is a good idea or should I play Peterson?

Personally I'd start Peterson every week no matter who he's against. Didn't he just post 150 yards against the Ravens?