: Fri Feb 06, 2009 5:53 pm
Andy Gilder wrote:
Because Anderson is frustratingly inconsistent - he either takes a cheap five-for or gets 1-150 and doesn't contribute anything with the bat.
Broad has never taken more than three wickets in a Test innings (although hopefully that may change now he's got a couple today), he bowls almost 50% more balls per wicket than Anderson, and his economy rate is only slightly better.
The selectors seem to have been overly keen to fast-track him into the team at a tender age (with Matthew Hoggard discarded far too readily at an age when the typical fast medium bowler is still at his peak) and keep him there. His batting affords limited balance to the lower order when his bowling has generally been so innocuous.