Re: The Football Chat Thread : Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:41 am
Ajw71 wrote:
I thought Everton were a joke. Parked the bus from minute 1 and had 10 men behind the ball almost every City attack. So negative. It's hard to break a team down when they do that.
Your last sentence is exactly why Moyes went to City with the set up he did, had we gone and played 442 or some other fancy attacking formation City would've done to us what they done to Spurs, Swansea and everybody else this season. He packed the Midfield to stop City creating chance after chance and for the majority of the game it worked, Rodwell done a brilliant man to man job on Silva, he didn't get anywhere first half and only got away twice in the second, not many teams have kept Nasri, Dzeko, Aguero and Silva as quiet as we did yesterday. Ballotelli made a huge difference, his movement from the left stretched us bigtime and we couldn't handle him, that's one of the best appearences I've seen him make for City he changed the game.
Moyes made the changes when we went behind but before that things were going as well as we probably could've hoped. The only thing I'd liked to have seen different would've been Saha, if he's ready, upfront with Cahill behind, he's much much more effective playing behind a main striker and has a solid scoring record at City. Vellios and Denis aren't ready to be playing the lone front role yet and Drenthe is still finding his fitness so it's the best Moyes could've done with Saha having limited game time this season, we had a gameplan to stop City playing and until Ballotelli came on we'd more or less done exactly that. Had we still had the likes of Areta and Pienaar in our squad or maybe even a fully fit Drenthe then I think we would've have set up differently but we are not in that position yet. It's not negative, it's using what you have to get a result at one of the league's best teams.