Re: The Football Chat Thread : Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:19 pm
keithcun wrote:
I told you to do some research, then maybe you'd know what you're talking about.
It's nothing to do with net spend, the figures accumulated in the "pounds per point" table include the cost of buying the club (approx £300m) and therefore only run from just over 12 months in Liverpool's case as they were bought just over 12 months ago. In Everton's case for example, the figures are calculated back to 2004 when Kenwright bought the majority shares in the club.
If it was based solely on player purchases they might have a point, but I doubt they even take wages etc into account.
As I said, it's the most pointless table/statistics ever.
It's nothing to do with net spend, the figures accumulated in the "pounds per point" table include the cost of buying the club (approx £300m) and therefore only run from just over 12 months in Liverpool's case as they were bought just over 12 months ago. In Everton's case for example, the figures are calculated back to 2004 when Kenwright bought the majority shares in the club.
If it was based solely on player purchases they might have a point, but I doubt they even take wages etc into account.
As I said, it's the most pointless table/statistics ever.
Thanks for the lesson, but I only threw it up there after glancing over it in the paper? People were suggesting City were spending their money well so I put that.