back to back to back wrote:
We'll have barry soon. Who's proven to be a class player for england. Advantage of barry over hargreaves is he's left footed and that makes a big difference to balance of distribution when all your other midfielders are right footed.
What's capello trying to achieve with his midfield?
He's trying to put all our best players in their best position. I find it bizzare you call our midfield pedestrian. Lampard and gerrard and are up and down like yoyos. Look at the 2006 game after we went down to 10 men, our midfielders were trojans. There really is nothing llike adversity to bring out the english lion spirit.
You think having a left footed midfielder is a bigger advantage than having a quick, strong and tenacious midfielder? Jesus Christ, you'll have to tell all those coaches that play right footed midfielders then, the lefty is key to victory.
But Capello isn't putting players in their best position, and if he did, it would work even worse for balance. He plays Gerrard on the left, he plays Lampard in CM in a 4-4-2 when he's far better in a three man central midfield, as is Gerrard. Rooney has had some excellent games this season up front on his own, although I think he works just as well with a partner, I think 4-4-2 is the wrong formation for England.
Lampard and Gerrard work best in a three man midfield, preferably being the most advanced of the three. It isn't all about work rate and running around the field, discipline, protecting the defence, reading the game well and breaking up play is massive in a game of football. Our midfielders were trojans and it was Hargreaves who won MOTM in that game IIRC. Why do you think that is? Because he was the quick, industrious midfielder we'd been crying out for, and still are. Honestly, considering we're hardly a great passing side, we have to make ourselves 'hard to beat' against better sides, Lampard and Barry in midfield is not hard to beat.