RedTez wrote:
Fair points re Clausen Conroy, but from a lot that I've seen, he puts the ball up for some talented receivers to make plays on. There's a few mocks where I've seen Bradford going higher. Personally, i don't think there's a huge difference between the two. What I do quite like is Clausens attitude, he seems to be a leader. Reminds me a lot of Rivers in that sense.
Yeah, Golden Tate is his guy and is a very good reciever at the college level, whether he translates well to the NFL. The same can be said for all of the main programmes though, the likes of Notre Damme, USC, LSU, Florida, Ohio State etc always get the best players.
Bradford is decent but he's had shoulder surgery, McCoy is average. After that you get to guys that are projects, like Pike and Tebow. Personally even taking out the fact Bradford has an injury i think Clausen is miles ahead of him (and i think Clausen is better than Locker also). Clausen seems to be really divisive (maybe due to his attitude), some people really hate him even though he's had an excellent year by any standards.
Teams will regret passing on him and somebody will get a steal in the mid to late first like we did when we got Rodgers. If both Suh and Clausen pan out who would you rather have...Peyton Manning or Warren Sapp. 99.9% would take Manning. The principle applies to Suh/Clausen.
As for the Superbowl, i'm backing the Saints all the way. I dislike the Colts. I think the Saints will pick them apart. Saints by 10 IMO. Breesus Christ to be MVP.
