Re: The Football Chat Thread : Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:19 pm  

ash4hullfc wrote: Like he was innocent when he was biting an opponent? Like the innocence he shows when he's swan-diving all over the football field? Like he was innocent when he was giving the finger to Fulham fans? Hardly a surprise he's added to his rap sheet; Suarez is vile. Just out of interest, do you post on RAWK? http://www.luissuarez.co.uk/en/solidario-en Really does sound like a vile character. Read up on any sort of 'article' talking about Suarez's character and you'll see nothing but positivity. What he does on the field may upset you, but he's far from vile.

ash4hullfc wrote: Like he was innocent when he was biting an opponent? Like the innocence he shows when he's swan-diving all over the football field? Like he was innocent when he was giving the finger to Fulham fans? Hardly a surprise he's added to his rap sheet; Suarez is vile. Just out of interest, do you post on RAWK? http://www.luissuarez.co.uk/en/solidario-en Really does sound like a vile character. Read up on any sort of 'article' talking about Suarez's character and you'll see nothing but positivity. What he does on the field may upset you, but he's far from vile.

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:41 pm  

Prevaricate: To speak falsely or misleadingly; deliberately mistake or create an incorrect impression; lie. Also, anagram of Patrice Evra.

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:48 pm  

CORNISH wrote:

Prevaricate: To speak falsely or misleadingly; deliberately mistake or create an incorrect impression; lie. Also, anagram of Patrice Evra.

Okaaay, so Suarez was claimed to have said it, admitted saying it...., has been found guilty..

this just doesn't seem to compute in certain circles, how is that Evra's fault exactly?

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:52 pm  

Catalancs wrote:

To be fair WireFanaticIII placed the blame .

So have others. I wasn't claiming all Liverpool fans. The most insightful comment I have heard about teh whole issue was made by an LFC fan

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:54 pm  

CORNISH wrote:

Prevaricate: To speak falsely or misleadingly; deliberately mistake or create an incorrect impression; lie. Also, anagram of Patrice Evra.

You don't know he lied. You don't even have a strong case to justify your opinion.

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:56 pm  

Catalancs wrote: Back that up. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... tball.html "Chelsea have also been fined £25,000, though an allegation that Bethell had “engaged in racist conduct or language” was not proved and Chelsea were cleared of that charge." Catalancs wrote: Free him from where exactly? Free him from this hefty, unjust ban. Next.

Catalancs wrote: Back that up. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... tball.html "Chelsea have also been fined £25,000, though an allegation that Bethell had “engaged in racist conduct or language” was not proved and Chelsea were cleared of that charge." Catalancs wrote: Free him from where exactly? Free him from this hefty, unjust ban. Next.

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:01 pm  

flipper wrote:

Okaaay, so Suarez was claimed to have said it, admitted saying it...., has been found guilty..

this just doesn't seem to compute in certain circles, how is that Evra's fault exactly?

evra has admitted at the hearing using foul and abusive language to suarez. i am awaiting his fair punishment as he HAS ADMITTED saying it............

after all we ALL want a fair and impartial judgement dont we!!

the FA are not going to charge that twaaat even though he has admitted to an offence of using foul and abusive language. dont you think he should be charged and banned in the name of fairness??

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:03 pm  

Enfield Exile wrote:

You don't know he lied. You don't even have a strong case to justify your opinion.

i took that quote from a poster on another site. just threw it in here.got the reaction i expected TBH.

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:10 pm  

Lord Tony Smith wrote:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-united/3569115/Manchester-Uniteds-Patrice-Evra-banned-for-four-matches-over-Chelsea-altercation-Football.html

"Chelsea have also been fined £25,000, though an allegation that Bethell had “engaged in racist conduct or language” was not proved and Chelsea were cleared of that charge."

Free him from this hefty, unjust ban.

Next.

not proved, doesn't mean didn't happen.

Next!

Re: The Football Chat Thread : Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:11 pm  

http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/21122011/ ... uarez.html Though I guess the FA are specialists when it comes down to Uruguayan and French cultural differences.

http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/21122011/ ... uarez.html Though I guess the FA are specialists when it comes down to Uruguayan and French cultural differences.