Prince of Denmark wrote:
No, but actively discouraging people from attending a live game, whether it's just a handful or several hundred, is pathetic. If this had been an FCUM home game I wonder whether the club would have taken the same course of action?
We play em on 26th Jan at home so might find out then. The club have set a precedent now so if it happens to a home game they would have to take the same approach or face the backlash.
Prince of Denmark wrote:
How high in the football pyramid is FCUM aiming to progress? Because if you get as far as the Conference, never mind the Football League, your games are increasingly going to be subject to live televising at unconventional times. And the higher up the pyramid you go the harder it's going to be to fight against this issue.
If you look at the link that GT provided, it's not just the fact that the game has been moved that is the problem, it is the fact that it has been moved despite previous assurances from the league that no games would be moved unless both clubs agree, and in this case, both clubs objected to it being moved, yet they still changed the kick off time anyway.