Mark wrote:
Yeah, Shay Given was a stop gap signing. It was evident in the four and a half year deal he was given.
Evident? How is that conclusive? A four and a half year deal could just as likely have been a necessary concession to secure Given's service.
Mark wrote:
Hart fully earned his place, no doubt about that. But before his injury, Given was the true number one.
He was the No.1 at the time aye. Quick question. Why do you think City bought Hart when they did? (he was 19). Don't you think that's it's possible that they might have regarded him as an investment for the future? When Hart came back from being on loan he beat out the Icelandic guy (who was pretty reasonable himself) to get the number one spot. He got his chance then, the club saw that he needed a bit more experience (as I've said three times now) so they went for a veteran presence whilst Hart went to learn his trade. Again he returned and came back a better keeper, good enough to keep Given out and let the club release him.
I can only assume you didn't see him at that younger age because he looked as if he had something about him then. I've seen enough young keepers coming through to see one who stands out because it doesn't happen that often in any sport. He looks to me like we've landed the best English goalkeeper since Clemence, possibly since Banks, and yes I saying that there was a twinkle there when I first saw him play which suggest he had the potential to break that tradition of poop goalies we've developed (Nigel Martyn excepted). I know he isn't there yet but the signs are more promising than with any other young English goalies that I've seen in my lifetime. Perhaps someone can help me out with somebody who showed the same amount of promise?
Mark wrote:
Once Hart got a sniff, he took his chance.
Yes.
Mark wrote:
Kasper was there as well at the time. Both had been given a go.
He was pretty much irrelevant once we saw what Hart could do, hence him dropping to third choice quite quickly.