: Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:20 am  

RedTez wrote:

The Bronco's are now actively trying to trade Cutler. I hope he doesn't go to Clevland, I like Brady Quinn and don't want to see him in Denver. It does seem the best deal for them though.

I was looking forward to seeing Merriman pound the little cry baby this season, hopefully it can still happen at his new team!!

If they are trying to actively trade him then i still think Tampa is the best place and most likely. They will want him out of the division.

It depends who they want to replace Cutler really.

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:10 am  

I would not be surprised to see him go to Seattle for Hasselbeck and a swap of first rounders, then the Broncos can get Hasselbeck to groom their next QB of the future as well.

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:24 pm  

I said Cutler was a cry baby at the start of all this and now the fact that he won't return phone calls to not just McDaniels but to the owner Pat Bowlen just show that I was correct and I pity the team that trades for the fool.

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:02 pm  

DAR130 wrote:

I said Cutler was a cry baby at the start of all this and now the fact that he won't return phone calls to not just McDaniels but to the owner Pat Bowlen just show that I was correct and I pity the team that trades for the fool.

Clever stuff by Jay. Don't respond to them and hurry the situation up.

If we didn't have A-Rod i'd give anything to get Jay Cutler. As it is A-Rod is better.

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:22 pm  

ST_CONROY wrote:

Clever stuff by Jay. Don't respond to them and hurry the situation up.

If we didn't have A-Rod i'd give anything to get Jay Cutler. As it is A-Rod is better.

Only just and only because he learned for years behind Favre as opposed to 6 games behind plummer for cutler

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:55 pm  

I'd take Rodgers over Cutler any day of the week. Cutler is bad news. The hype got him into the pro bowl last year. What was it, 18 interceptions? I'd pass on that, thanks.

The organisation have put themselves behind the balck ball a bit now. Teams know they need to trade, so the value automatically goes down. The one thing in the Broncs favour is the fact that their are likely 4 or 5 teams (at least) interested, so that will push the value back up a bit. The best case for them now is the Browns 1st round pick and Brady Quinn. If they get that (or anywhere near it) they have played a blinder.

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:12 pm  

RedTez wrote:

I'd take Rodgers over Cutler any day of the week.

Definately. A-Rod might not yet be at the same level as Cutler but he is definately showing signs he can be an elite player and was, coming out of college, touted as a number one overall pick. I bet San Fran wish they had taken A-Rod over Smith. Don't get me wrong i'd definately rather have A-Rod but i'm a big Cutler fan.

RedTez wrote:

Cutler is bad news. The hype got him into the pro bowl last year. What was it, 18 interceptions? I'd pass on that, thanks.

The pro-bowl is worthless anyway. So many players get picked who don't deserve it.

Yep 18 interceptions which is second highest only to Favre with 22. He did have the fourth highest yards though i think.

RedTez wrote:

The organisation have put themselves behind the balck ball a bit now. Teams know they need to trade, so the value automatically goes down. The one thing in the Broncs favour is the fact that their are likely 4 or 5 teams (at least) interested, so that will push the value back up a bit. The best case for them now is the Browns 1st round pick and Brady Quinn. If they get that (or anywhere near it) they have played a blinder.

Apparently 8-10 teams interested.

I agree, if they want a QB in return then the Browns provide the best value with Quinn but surely they would want more than Quinn and the 5th. I'd expect Quinn, 5th overall pick and next years 1st round pick.

In terms of overall though, i still maintain Tampa is the best place. They get a mid to late round pick this year, a player and next years first round. I doubt they want to be lumbered with the 5th overall and 12th overall in terms of the amount it would cost for contracts.

: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:05 pm  

Isaac Bruce is gonna play another saeson with the 49ers after all.

I think this could be because they are possibly going to try and sign Tory Holt

: Thu Apr 02, 2009 3:01 pm  

LFCRhino wrote:

Isaac Bruce is gonna play another saeson with the 49ers after all.

I think this could be because they are possibly going to try and sign Tory Holt

I think its because Singletary is off his rocker

Bruce is what 97 years old now? Big gamble.

: Thu Apr 02, 2009 3:50 pm  

LFCRhino wrote:

Isaac Bruce is gonna play another saeson with the 49ers after all.

I think this could be because they are possibly going to try and sign Tory Holt

The recievers they have is irrelevant considering they don't have anybody to throw the ball to them.