Re: NFL Chat 2 : Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:49 am  

El Pac Carnegie wrote:

What a finish! 36-36 with xp to come. Steelers steal it

It's getting reviewed. Looked good on the angle they showed before the break.

Re: NFL Chat 2 : Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:49 am  

Damn, fair does to Ben great drive

Re: NFL Chat 2 : Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:51 am  

Bloody hell what a finish. Unlucky Conroy but that was a brilliant drive by Ben.

Re: NFL Chat 2 : Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:52 am  

Pittsburgh nick it 37-36

Re: NFL Chat 2 : Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:53 am  

Hollywood Harrigan wrote:

Bloody hell what a finish. Unlucky Conroy but that was a brilliant drive by Ben.

Yeah it was a brilliant drive. "Average" Aaron matched him all game though. Shame our D couldn't hold out for one play. Jarrett Bush (i know it was Bell on the TD) is the worst NFL player i have ever seen.

Re: NFL Chat 2 : Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:59 am  

In my fantasy team I have Manning and Mendenhall, I dropped them both. All over to AP and Sidney Rice now to pull me out of the fire and pull of a miracle win. I'm 6 points behind and he has Favre, Nicks and Tynes left to play.
My only hope is that Favre only throws the ball to Rice and AP runs lots.

Re: NFL Chat 2 : Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:07 am  

Was confused as to why Offiah is on 5 but then all became clear with his book.

So who will we take at #1? I know very little about the college game, just what you fellas say. Apparently the QB class is weak and some guy called Suh is a bit special? Where do you guys get all this college knowledge?

Re: NFL Chat 2 : Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:16 am  

El Pac Carnegie wrote:

Was confused as to why Offiah is on 5 but then all became clear with his book.

So who will we take at #1? I know very little about the college game, just what you fellas say. Apparently the QB class is weak and some guy called Suh is a bit special? Where do you guys get all this college knowledge?

From watching it and reading up on it.

Rams will go Jimmy Clausen from Notre Damme. You need a QB. Suh is immense but i don't think you go that way and get a lineman for the third year in succession. Clausen is the best in the class, whether he is deserving of going that high is a different question.

I don't think you can wait for a QB and go Suh. Jake Loker (who IMO was the #2 QB) has gone back to college so it then becomes Tebow, McCoy, Bradford who i don't rate and will probably be gone before your second pick.

Suh is the better player but you go Clausen IMO.

Re: NFL Chat 2 : Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:59 am  

Oakland go and do it again

The most frustrating team in the league to support, without a doubt.

Re: NFL Chat 2 : Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:50 am  

ST_CONROY wrote:

From watching it and reading up on it.

Rams will go Jimmy Clausen from Notre Damme. You need a QB. Suh is immense but i don't think you go that way and get a lineman for the third year in succession. Clausen is the best in the class, whether he is deserving of going that high is a different question.

I don't think you can wait for a QB and go Suh. Jake Loker (who IMO was the #2 QB) has gone back to college so it then becomes Tebow, McCoy, Bradford who i don't rate and will probably be gone before your second pick.

Suh is the better player but you go Clausen IMO.

I still think if we get the number 1 pick (which is looking likely after last night) we go Suh. He's looking like one of those players you don't pass up on regardless of need (and defensive tackle is a definite need). We 've generated little to no pressure on the defensive line and that affects the whole defense. Suh will give us a chance to improve a unit that has showed a lot of promise this season despite our record.

Offensively we've been anaemic this season but we're playing players who were on the practice squad at the beginning of the season on both sides of the ball. I just get the feeling that picking Clausen at #1 would be one of those decisions that comes back to bite us