: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:23 pm  

Austin doing 0k today (-4) 6 to play but do not think he will get close enough overnight to really challenge

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:29 pm  

espanyolswan wrote:

Both safely through to the semi-Finals

Ante Post Favourite out, fair few shocks....all to play for though will need to see the times in the Racing Post to really know the score!!!

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:56 pm  

Thetalentboy wrote:

Dont know if anyone has mentioned this but

St Helens v Bradford +22 @ 10/11 looks like a very good bet indeed as Bradford will be well up for it after getting hammered by Wire

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:05 pm  

Thetalentboy wrote:

8)

Fair play did not back it myself but you a great shout by you

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:14 pm  

Did anyone get on Hills before when they were still offering their early prices on the golf? Choi 100/1 when he was 4 back (16s everywhere else), Matteson 50/1 (14s everywhere else) when he was 1 back and Poulter 33/1 (18s everywhere else) when he was 3 back. What were they thinking?

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:19 pm  

Sthelens RLFC wrote:

Did anyone get on Hills before when they were still offering their early prices on the golf? Choi 100/1 when he was 4 back (16s everywhere else), Matteson 50/1 (14s everywhere else) when he was 1 back and Poulter 33/1 (18s everywhere else) when he was 3 back. What were they thinking?

Were you looking on oddschecker often the prices there are delayed and you will not get on...if you did fair enough but often there is a lag especially on Golf and more so the European tour when it is in Asia and played over night.

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:21 pm  

Austin 5 under with 2 to play...a little hope there

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:25 pm  

Petrovic 5 under too...finished his round.

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:26 pm  

espanyolswan wrote:

Were you looking on oddschecker often the prices there are delayed and you will not get on...if you did fair enough but often there is a lag especially on Golf and more so the European tour when it is in Asia and played over night.

I was looking on oddschecker and was as surprised as anyone when i clicked through and they still allowed the bets. I've often deposited money into one of my accounts in preparation to place a bet on a price I've seen on oddschecker only for it to be suspended but this was allowing me to bet on what I wanted although strangely enough, the bigger the price on the golfer the less it would allow me to have. I have double the amount on Matteson at 50s that I have on Choi at 100s, and they were both max bets.

If things go pear shaped, I'll be laying them off tomorrow I would imagine.

: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:27 pm  

Sthelens RLFC wrote:

I was looking on oddschecker and was as surprised as anyone when i clicked through and they still allowed the bets. I've often deposited money into one of my accounts in preparation to place a bet on a price I've seen on oddschecker only for it to be suspended but this was allowing me to bet on what I wanted although strangely enough, the bigger the price on the golfer the less it would allow me to have. I have double the amount on Matteson at 50s that I have on Choi at 100s, and they were both max bets.

If things go pear shaped, I'll be laying them off tomorrow I would imagine.

Hills odds makers must have been asleep then...fair play to you