I like Wiggo and I think his response to that specific question was to be expected.
The issue I have with that response is that it does nothing to put doping behind us. Is that his job? No, probably not but it would do a great job in helping to put doping behind this new peloton.
Cuddles wasted this opportunity last year at the end of the Tour when he was asked about what his victory meant for clean cycling (or words to that effect).
His response was 'I'm not the best guy to ask about that'.
He missed a great opportunity to say 'Today I proved that it is possible to pursue your dreams in cycling without doping. '
Instead it sounded like somebody else observing the secret code of the 'omerta' and left me (and plenty others) wondering just what exactly did he have to hide.
Wiggo has the opportunity to be a little bit more eloquent than he was yesterday. I for one would like to see a response which has some real teeth. One which puts a marker down for him and for young impressionable cyclists to see that it is only hard work that has got Wiggins to where he is.