: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:08 pm  

ST_CONROY wrote:

I disagree with the Browns getting an A (and the best overall by the looks of it).

Seattle should be an A.

Bengals should be A.

Detroit should be a D not B.

Kansas City should be D not C.

Denver should be D not C.

San Fran should be a B not C.

Me too with Cleveland but now that i have looked at it again i think the fans votes count aswell so that may be why they are so high up ?

: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:18 pm  

LFCRhino wrote:

Me too with Cleveland but now that i have looked at it again i think the fans votes count aswell so that may be why they are so high up ?

Maybe so. Should be a B/C.

Detroit at a B is wrong IMO. They took Stafford which was the only logical choice. But then passed on a LT not once, in Oher but twice by passing on Beatty also. Why would you pass on the chance to select the player to protect your million pound investment. They will have to select the top tackle in 2010, no doubt with another top 2-3 pick.

Denver should be lower for selecting a player who doesn't fit the system and trading a first round player for a poor corner. They gave away what IMO will be the number one overall pick next year.

: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:25 pm  

ST_CONROY wrote:

Maybe so. Should be a B/C.

Detroit at a B is wrong IMO. They took Stafford which was the only logical choice. But then passed on a LT not once, in Oher but twice by passing on Beatty also. Why would you pass on the chance to select the player to protect your million pound investment. They will have to select the top tackle in 2010, no doubt with another top 2-3 pick.

Denver should be lower for selecting a player who doesn't fit the system and trading a first round player for a poor corner. They gave away what IMO will be the number one overall pick next year.

I can see detroit owning that again to be honest they never seem to get any better and i still think oakland will be poor!

: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:29 pm  

LFCRhino wrote:

I can see detroit owning that again to be honest they never seem to get any better and i still think oakland will be poor!

I think it'll be close between Denver, Detroit and Kansas City for the number one pick.

I'll go Denver to get number one overall, Kansas City second and Detroit third. All with 3-5 wins.

: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:33 pm  

NFC North: Vikes
NFC South: Bucs
NFC East: Eagles
NFC West: Seahawks
NFC Wildcard 1: Giants
NFC Wildcard 2: Packers

AFC North: Steelers
AFC South: Colts
AFC East: Pats
AFC West: Bolts
AFC Wildcard 1: Texans
AFC Wildcard 2: Jets

AFC Championship Game: Pats v Steelers
NFC Championship Game: Bucs v Vikes

Superbowl: Pats v Vikes = Pats to win

: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:34 pm  

ST_CONROY wrote:

I think it'll be close between Denver, Detroit and Kansas City for the number one pick.

I'll go Denver to get number one overall, Kansas City second and Detroit third. All with 3-5 wins.

Yeah they should all be there or there abouts but every season there seems to be a "shock" team who finish in the bottom 4 or 5 one that people have tipped to make the playoffs and im not sure the Rams have improved enough to stay away from the bottom end.

: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm  

LFCRhino wrote:

Yeah they should all be there or there abouts but every season there seems to be a "shock" team who finish in the bottom 4 or 5 one that people have tipped to make the playoffs and im not sure the Rams have improved enough to stay away from the bottom end.

Yeah maybe so, kind of like Seattle this year just gone. They are a pretty good team but were decimated by injuries.

I think Jacksonville could be down in the bottom five this year.

: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:43 pm  

ST_CONROY wrote:

Yeah maybe so, kind of like Seattle this year just gone. They are a pretty good team but were decimated by injuries.

I think Jacksonville could be down in the bottom five this year.

Yeah i was thinking somewhere along the lines of them or maybe the Bills

: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:49 pm  

ST_CONROY wrote:

I think it'll be close between Denver, Detroit and Kansas City for the number one pick.

I'll go Denver to get number one overall, Kansas City second and Detroit third. All with 3-5 wins.

What about the Raiders ?

: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:51 pm  

Dead Man Walking wrote:

What about the Raiders ?

LFCRhino wrote:

I can see detroit owning that again to be honest they never seem to get any better and i still think oakland will be poor!