BrisbaneRhino wrote:
I can't see him winning a Grand Slam - which like it or not is the measure of how good a player is once their career is over. My issues are that he does seem to play poorly at the very time he needs to be at his absolute best, and that I've never seen him play anything like the level of a Federer/Nadal at their best. I also wouldn't call him a bottler, but he is ridiculously overhyped, as Henman was before him.
He may not win a Slam but he is number 5 in the world on merit, has won a number of Masters series events and has reached three grand slam finals at the age of 23.
He is a World Class player and therefore hardly overhyped.