: Thu May 14, 2009 6:33 pm
Billy Banter wrote:
I thought slavery was abolished in the 19th century. He doesn't own Tevez and he shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a deal after the West Ham debacle.
Who exactly does own Tevez then? This is a genuine question, not fishing or trying to cause controversy, because us and Mancs fans seem to be getting on swimmingly on here at the moment.
How have his circumstances changed since West Ham were fielding a player owned by a third party? I know we bought Mascherano, but if Tevez is still on loan at Manchester United then who from?
Yours, confused.