Thoughts on the poodle haired pr*ck yesterday......
So the whole peloton attacked after Valverde hit the deck did they?
Or..........and I'm 99% certain that this is what I saw.
Crosswinds hit at a time when the peloton realised it was now or never to catch the breakaway. Sky went to the front with BMC to drive the peloton along and Valverde found himself in the wrong place at the wrong time. It was a 'racing' accident and not a mechanical failure.
So should the peloton stop when the race leader has an accident down to his own bike handling skills? Sky did not attack after he went down. Valverde fell down because Sky attacked. In this case I don't think Sky should have stopped. I'm damn sure it was Movistar I saw attacking the day Cadel Evans had his punctures. I'm also pretty sure Movistar did something similar in Paris-Nice.
It's OK to occupy the high moral ground Movistar if you occupy it all the time and not just when it suits.
Valverde would not know high moral ground if it came up and smacked him in his dirty unrepentant dopers mouth!