[Fantastic Mr Catpiss]

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:24 pm  

Danny 2 wrote:

i bet big show says to hatton that he can lay him out hatton comes out and Y2J grabs hold of him and shows lamps him

or hatton lays both of them out

i reckon there'll be some mayweather banter thrown in for good measure.

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:14 pm  

Announced for next week's smackdown are;

Jericho v Undertaker
Ziggler v Morrison-IC Title.

Just a big excited now after hearing that.

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:59 pm  

The 59 Sound wrote:

Announced for next week's smackdown are;

Jericho v Undertaker
Ziggler v Morrison-IC Title.

Just a big excited now after hearing that.

Thought it was Taker V cm punk in a casket match?

: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:50 pm  

Moon Knight wrote:

Thought it was Taker V cm punk in a casket match?

That's a dark match. They have them at most shows, it's likely to last about 4 minutes.

: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:01 am  

Went to see RAW in america during the summer, the one when jeremy piven was guest host.... will be interested to see how monday compares to the USA show.

: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:26 pm  

http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/article ... thal-89801 The WWE is missing something like the X-Division IMO. This is one of 3 areas where i'd consider TNA to be superior. (Along with Tag Teams/Stables and The Womens division)

http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/article ... thal-89801 The WWE is missing something like the X-Division IMO. This is one of 3 areas where i'd consider TNA to be superior. (Along with Tag Teams/Stables and The Womens division)

: Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:19 pm  

Drachen Feuer wrote:

http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/article/video-tna-webmatch-amazing-red-vs-jay-lethal-89801

The WWE is missing something like the X-Division IMO. This is one of 3 areas where i'd consider TNA to be superior. (Along with Tag Teams/Stables and The Womens division)

WWE shouldn't have got rid of the Cruiserweight title, yes the Light Heavyweight title but not the Cruiserweight. TNA is starting to concentrate on the X Division a bit more again after a period where it was forgot about.

An Ultimate X match is being done at the Wembley show in January, it will be the first time the Ultimate X has been used at a non televised event. I left a comment on Jeremy Borash's twitter saying I'd love it if we could have Ultimate X in Manchester.

: Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:21 pm  

lister wrote:

WWE shouldn't have got rid of the Cruiserweight title, yes the Light Heavyweight title but not the Cruiserweight. TNA is starting to concentrate on the X Division a bit more again after a period where it was forgot about.

An Ultimate X match is being done at the Wembley show in January, it will be the first time the Ultimate X has been used at a non televised event. I left a comment on Jeremy Borash's twitter saying I'd love it if we could have Ultimate X in Manchester.

I thought they were basically the same title, i.e. didn't the Cruiserweight just replace the Light Heavyweight?

: Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:22 pm  

they merged the titles during or just after the invasion storyline. like they did with the US/IC belts

: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:22 am  

Roofs wrote:

Oh no don't get me wrong I loved it - wrestling needs a little edgeiness (sp) like that - WWE is going in totally the wrong direction IMO.

Can see Virgin 1's coverage been great for TNA building their UK audience.

Oh and loved the match between Tara and Future Legend (sorry, can't remember her actual name) in particular.

WWE is a business. It makes perfect business sense in this current economical climate to maximise their revenue. Kids buy the most merchandise - or rather their parents do. Focus on attracting more kids and you will make more money. Simples.

The product will suffer but when the company gets through this downturn they will go back to the edgier stuff and raise ratings again.