: Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:57 pm  

Matt23 wrote:

Great post TAP.

Seconded.

: Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:57 pm  

PAUL M wrote:

No idea.

Pacqaio v Cotto is free this weekend, 2am.

That'll be a right tear up I hope. Thanks for letting me know.

: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:32 pm  

Nemanja wrote:

Couldn't agree more. Watt was a stupid biased c*nt throughout.

For a supposed 'expert' his commentary was embarrassing.

: Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:27 pm  

Blobbynator wrote:

For a supposed 'expert' his commentary was embarrassing.

His commentary is often embarrassing....he obviously has a huge problem with any fighter who has talent and a little bit of arrogance with it, especially if they are British.

I recall that when Carl Froch was on Sky, Watt would constantly criticise his style and tactics, and then after Froch's inevitable victory, would then spend 5 minutes backtracking all the $h!te he had previously spouted...

: Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:24 pm  

Why don't the Klitchkos fight each other? They're supposed to be the best two heaveyweights, they hold most of the belts between them, they're both unbeaten for ages, yet each avoids the best other heavyweight instead of taking steps towards a unified title. Neither of them deserves a shot at Haye (or Ruiz) until they've fought each other.

: Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:07 pm  

Prince of Denmark wrote:

Why don't the Klitchkos fight each other? They're supposed to be the best two heaveyweights, they hold most of the belts between them, they're both unbeaten for ages, yet each avoids the best other heavyweight instead of taking steps towards a unified title. Neither of them deserves a shot at Haye (or Ruiz) until they've fought each other.

They promised their mam they wouldn't

: Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:31 pm  

Prince of Denmark wrote:

Why don't the Klitchkos fight each other? They're supposed to be the best two heaveyweights, they hold most of the belts between them, they're both unbeaten for ages, yet each avoids the best other heavyweight instead of taking steps towards a unified title. Neither of them deserves a shot at Haye (or Ruiz) until they've fought each other.

It's Haye that might not deserve a shot at either of the Klitchko's and not the other way around.

: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:33 pm  

Dead Man Walking wrote:

It's Haye that might not deserve a shot at either of the Klitchko's and not the other way around.

Why wouldn't Haye deserve a shot? If he beats Ruiz, then he is THE best candidate to challenge the Klitchko brothers.

: Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:16 pm  

Blobbynator wrote:

Why wouldn't Haye deserve a shot? If he beats Ruiz, then he is THE only candidate to challenge the Klitchko brothers.

Edited!

: Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:43 pm  

Renda v Samuels...you ain't going to see that happen again for a long time!!!!