Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:23 pmMikePB wrote:
Thats rubbish. Mid-table at the best
How do you know?
How do you know?
WWW.RLFANS.COM
The worlds most popular Rugby League website
https://retro.rlfans.com/
Gene Hackman Sacked aka the Football Chat Thread
Page 100 of 101
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:23 pmHow do you know?
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:28 pmStirlingshire Saint wrote:
At first I would agree, however within 5 years Celtic would certainly be challenging. They are a huge, huge football club and with the handouts Sky would be giving simply due to being in the Prem, it would be a matter of time before they challenged top 4.
Chortle.
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:46 pmEnfield Exile wrote:
It depends what you mean by 'one of the biggest'. Top 10? Top 20? Top 30?
We (i.e. richest club in the world) have become their feeder club so they must be 'big'.
I was actually in a bar once in Ho Chi Minh City where there was a Celtic Supporters Club meeting. Very strange, I must say.
We (i.e. richest club in the world) have become their feeder club so they must be 'big'.
I was actually in a bar once in Ho Chi Minh City where there was a Celtic Supporters Club meeting. Very strange, I must say.
20th richest club in the world.
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:47 pmStirlingshire Saint wrote:
Celtic would comfortably be competing with the likes of Chelsea, Man Utd, Real and co if they were in the Prem. The size of both the Glasgow clubs is difficult to grasp unless you view it firsthand.
Welcome back, one of your teams due to play in a final I see?
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:55 pmBilly Banter wrote:
Typo.
Whatever happened to Leeds/Arsenal Lenny? Banned?
Whatever happened to Leeds/Arsenal Lenny? Banned?
He's become a lifelong Manchester United fan.
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:58 pmLord God Jose Mourinho wrote:
He's become a lifelong Manchester United fan.
He vanishes during times of woe at the booty
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:06 pmBad Boy wrote:
20th richest club in the world.
20th biggest in terms of revenue. United topped that list but they are the poorest club in the whole wide world
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:07 pmEnfield Exile wrote:
20th biggest in terms of revenue. United topped that list but they are the poorest club in the whole wide world
Just dealing with the facts EE.
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:16 pmRedTez wrote:
Like Newcastle? And City? And Leeds?
Sky money does not = sucess. Yes clubs get the millions, but so do 19 others. Celtic are no bigger a club than City, Spurs or Leeds.
Sky money does not = sucess. Yes clubs get the millions, but so do 19 others. Celtic are no bigger a club than City, Spurs or Leeds.
That is laughable.
Celtic are monumental, their problem is the standard of the league they play in. Celtic as a club are on a par with the worlds top, top clubs, there are very few clubs which could pull the attendances that they do for games against the standards of St Mirren, Inverness and co.
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:30 pmStirlingshire Saint wrote:
That is laughable.
Celtic are monumental, their problem is the standard of the league they play in. Celtic as a club are on a par with the worlds top, top clubs, there are very few clubs which could pull the attendances that they do for games against the standards of St Mirren, Inverness and co.
Celtic are monumental, their problem is the standard of the league they play in. Celtic as a club are on a par with the worlds top, top clubs, there are very few clubs which could pull the attendances that they do for games against the standards of St Mirren, Inverness and co.
It's a good job we don't want them in the english leagues then isn't it?